• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于呼吸健康工作者在减轻慢性气流受限所致损伤、残疾和障碍方面有效性的随机对照试验。

Randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a respiratory health worker in reducing impairment, disability, and handicap due to chronic airflow limitation.

作者信息

Littlejohns P, Baveystock C M, Parnell H, Jones P W

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.

出版信息

Thorax. 1991 Aug;46(8):559-64. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.8.559.

DOI:10.1136/thx.46.8.559
PMID:1926024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC463273/
Abstract

A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to determine whether a respiratory health worker was effective in reducing the respiratory impairment, disability, and handicap experienced by patients with chronic airflow limitation attending a respiratory outpatient department. The 152 adults (aged 30-75 years) who participated had a prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) below 60% predicted and no other disease. They were randomised to receive the care of a respiratory health worker or the normal services provided by the outpatient department. The respiratory health worker provided health education and symptom and treatment monitoring in liaison with primary care services. After one year there was little difference between the two groups in spirometric values (FEV1 and forced vital capacity before and after salbutamol 200 micrograms), disability (six minute walking distance and paced step test), and handicap (sickness impact profile, hospital anxiety and depression scale). Patients not looked after by the respiratory health worker were more likely to die (relative risk 2.9 (95% confidence limits 0.8, 10.2); when age and FEV1 were controlled for this risk increased to 5.5 (95% confidence limits 1.2, 24.5). Patients looked after by the respiratory health worker attended their general practitioner more frequently and were prescribed a greater range of drugs. This is the third study to have found limited measurable benefit in terms of morbidity from the intervention of a respiratory health worker. This may be due to the ability of such workers to keep frail patients alive.

摘要

一项随机对照试验旨在确定呼吸健康工作者是否能有效减轻在呼吸科门诊就诊的慢性气流受限患者所经历的呼吸功能损害、残疾和障碍。参与试验的152名成年人(年龄在30 - 75岁之间),其支气管扩张剂前一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)低于预测值的60%,且无其他疾病。他们被随机分配接受呼吸健康工作者的护理或门诊提供的常规服务。呼吸健康工作者与基层医疗服务机构联络,提供健康教育以及症状和治疗监测。一年后,两组在肺功能指标(FEV1以及使用200微克沙丁胺醇前后的用力肺活量)、残疾程度(六分钟步行距离和定速步测)和障碍程度(疾病影响量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表)方面几乎没有差异。未由呼吸健康工作者护理的患者死亡可能性更高(相对风险为2.9(95%置信区间0.8, 10.2);在控制年龄和FEV1后,此风险增加至5.5(95%置信区间1.2, 24.5)。由呼吸健康工作者护理的患者更频繁地就诊于全科医生,并且被开具的药物种类更多。这是第三项发现呼吸健康工作者的干预在发病率方面的可测量益处有限的研究。这可能是由于这类工作者有能力维持体弱患者的生命。

相似文献

1
Randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a respiratory health worker in reducing impairment, disability, and handicap due to chronic airflow limitation.一项关于呼吸健康工作者在减轻慢性气流受限所致损伤、残疾和障碍方面有效性的随机对照试验。
Thorax. 1991 Aug;46(8):559-64. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.8.559.
2
A randomised controlled crossover trial of nurse practitioner versus doctor led outpatient care in a bronchiectasis clinic.支气管扩张症门诊中护士执业者主导与医生主导的门诊护理的随机对照交叉试验。
Thorax. 2002 Aug;57(8):661-6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.8.661.
3
Relationships between general health measured with the sickness impact profile and respiratory symptoms, physiological measures, and mood in patients with chronic airflow limitation.使用疾病影响量表测量的总体健康状况与慢性气流受限患者的呼吸道症状、生理指标及情绪之间的关系。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Dec;140(6):1538-43. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.6.1538.
4
Controlled trial of respiratory muscle training in chronic airflow limitation.慢性气流受限患者呼吸肌训练的对照试验
Thorax. 1992 Aug;47(8):598-602. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.8.598.
5
[Study of the clinical phenotype of symptomatic chronic airways disease by hierarchical cluster analysis and two-step cluster analyses].[采用层次聚类分析和两步聚类分析对症状性慢性气道疾病临床表型的研究]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 1;55(9):679-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.09.005.
6
Comparison of the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale-Self Report and clinical judgment in patients with chronic lung disease.慢性肺病患者疾病心理社会适应量表-自我报告与临床判断的比较
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-6. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199801000-00004.
7
Effect of increasing doses of beta agonists on spirometric parameters, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation.递增剂量β受体激动剂对慢性气流受限患者肺量计参数、运动能力及生活质量的影响
Thorax. 1994 May;49(5):479-84. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.5.479.
8
Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病的门诊肺康复治疗
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Sep-Oct;31(5):541-5.
9
A self-management approach using self-initiated action plans for symptoms with ongoing nurse support in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and comorbidities: the COPE-III study protocol.一种自我管理方法,在持续的护士支持下,让慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和合并症患者使用自我启动的行动计划来处理症状:COPE-III 研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Home care by outreach nursing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的外展护理居家照护
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000994.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated disease management interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的综合疾病管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):CD009437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009437.pub3.
2
How will telemedicine change clinical practice in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?远程医疗将如何改变慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床实践?
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753465818754778. doi: 10.1177/1753465818754778.
3
Features of self-management interventions for people with COPD associated with improved health-related quality of life and reduced emergency department visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施与健康相关生活质量改善及急诊就诊次数减少相关的特征:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jun 8;12:1705-1720. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S133317. eCollection 2017.
4
Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 19;2014(3):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub3.
5
Reporting participation rates in studies of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.报告慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者非药物干预研究中的参与率:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 29;1:66. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-66.
6
Home care by outreach nursing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的外展护理居家照护
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD000994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000994.pub3.
7
Association between lung function and exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD.COPD 患者肺功能与加重频率的相关性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010 Dec 9;5:435-44. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S13826.
8
Strategies for improving outcomes of COPD exacerbations.改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期治疗效果的策略。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2006;1(3):335-42. doi: 10.2147/copd.2006.1.3.335.
9
Intermediate care--Hospital-at-Home in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: British Thoracic Society guideline.中级护理——慢性阻塞性肺疾病的居家医院模式:英国胸科学会指南
Thorax. 2007 Mar;62(3):200-10. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.064931. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
10
Effectiveness of innovations in nurse led chronic disease management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence.护士主导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者慢性病管理创新措施的有效性:证据的系统评价
BMJ. 2005 Sep 3;331(7515):485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38512.664167.8F. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.疾病影响量表:一种健康状况测量工具的开发与最终修订
Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787-805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001.
2
Psychosocial concomitants to rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Part 2. Psychosocial treatment.慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复的社会心理伴随因素。第2部分。社会心理治疗。
Chest. 1980 Apr;77(4):544-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.77.4.544.
3
The hospital anxiety and depression scale.医院焦虑抑郁量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
4
Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease.呼吸系统疾病中的两分钟、六分钟和十二分钟步行测试。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1607.
5
Nurse practitioner role in a chronic congestive heart failure clinic: in-hospital time, costs, and patient satisfaction.
Heart Lung. 1983 May;12(3):237-40.
6
Performance, ventilation, and oxygen consumption in three different types of exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者三种不同类型运动试验中的表现、通气及耗氧量
Thorax. 1985 Aug;40(8):581-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.40.8.581.
7
The relation of thirteen-year mortality to ventilatory impairment and other respiratory symptoms: the Cracow Study.
Int J Epidemiol. 1986 Mar;15(1):56-64. doi: 10.1093/ije/15.1.56.
8
Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment.疾病影响概况量表能否衡量变化?量表评估示例。
J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90110-4.
9
The cost and efficacy of home care for patients with chronic lung disease.慢性肺病患者居家护理的成本与疗效
Med Care. 1988 Jun;26(6):566-79. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198806000-00005.
10
Controlled trial of respiratory health worker visiting patients with chronic respiratory disability.呼吸健康工作者探访慢性呼吸功能障碍患者的对照试验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jan 24;294(6566):225-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6566.225.