LoCastro Joseph S, Youngblood Marston, Cisler Ron A, Mattson Margaret E, Zweben Allen, Anton Raymond F, Donovan Dennis M
Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts 02130, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Mar;70(2):186-96. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.186.
To evaluate the full range of alcohol treatment effectiveness, it is important to assess secondary nondrinking outcome dimensions in addition to primary alcohol consumption outcomes.
We used a large sample (n=1,226) of alcohol-dependent participants entering the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism-sponsored COMBINE (Combining Medications and Behavioral Interventions) Study, a multisite clinical trial of pharmacological (naltrexone [ReVia] and acamprosate [Campral]) and behavioral interventions, to examine the effects of specific treatment combinations on nondrinking functional outcomes. We assessed the outcomes at baseline and at the end of 16 weeks of alcohol treatment and again at the 26-week and/or 52-week postrandomization follow-ups.
(1) Drinking and secondary outcomes were significantly related, especially at the follow-up periods. A higher percentage of heavy drinking days, more drinks per drinking day, and lower percentage of days abstinent were associated with lower quality-of-life measures. (2) All nondrinking outcomes showed improvement at the end of 16 weeks of treatment and most maintained improvement over the 26-week and 52-week follow-ups. Only two measures returned to pretreatment levels at 52 weeks: percentage of days paid for work and physical health. Improvements of nondrinking outcomes remained even after adjusting for posttreatment heavy drinking status. (3) Although nondrinking outcomes showed overall improvement, specific pharmacological and behavioral treatment combinations were not differentially effective on specific secondary outcomes.
In the current study, changes that resulted from treatment were multidimensional, and improvements in nondrinking outcomes reflected the overall significant improvement in drinking but they were not differentiated between treatment combination groups. Findings from this study support the importance of including secondary nondrinking outcomes in clinical alcohol-treatment trials.
为了评估酒精治疗效果的全貌,除了主要的酒精消费结果外,评估次要的非饮酒结果维度也很重要。
我们使用了一个大型样本(n = 1226),这些酒精依赖参与者进入了美国国立酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所资助的综合治疗(联合药物治疗和行为干预)研究,这是一项关于药物治疗(纳曲酮[瑞凡]和阿坎酸[坎普拉尔])和行为干预的多中心临床试验,以研究特定治疗组合对非饮酒功能结果的影响。我们在基线、酒精治疗16周结束时以及随机分组后26周和/或52周随访时评估了这些结果。
(1)饮酒与次要结果显著相关,尤其是在随访期间。重度饮酒天数的百分比越高、每个饮酒日的饮酒量越多以及戒酒天数的百分比越低,与生活质量指标越低相关。(2)所有非饮酒结果在治疗16周结束时均有改善,并且在26周和52周随访期间大多数保持改善。只有两项指标在52周时恢复到治疗前水平:工作报酬天数百分比和身体健康。即使在调整治疗后重度饮酒状态后,非饮酒结果的改善仍然存在。(3)尽管非饮酒结果总体上有所改善,但特定的药物和行为治疗组合对特定的次要结果并没有差异有效性。
在当前研究中,治疗导致的变化是多维度的,非饮酒结果的改善反映了饮酒方面的总体显著改善,但在治疗组合组之间没有差异。本研究结果支持在临床酒精治疗试验中纳入次要非饮酒结果的重要性。