Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):601-612. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000750.
For individuals in alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment, many argue that holistic indicators such as quality of life (QoL) should be more consistently used in addition to drinking-related indicators. QoL increases from pre- to post-AUD treatment, but the mechanisms are unclear. The present study examined the roles of positive and negative affect in QoL change during AUD treatment and additionally explored the relationship between QoL change and medication adherence.
We examined the mediating roles of end-of-treatment positive affect (i.e., vigor) and negative affect (i.e., stress and tension) in the relationship between baseline (BL) and 26-week QoL among participants in the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence study randomized to medication management (MM; n = 468) or medication management plus combined behavioral intervention (MMCBI; n = 479) for AUD. We also explored whether changes in QoL were associated with medication adherence.
Change in psychological health QoL was mediated by increased vigor (i.e., positive affect) and decreased stress, and change in environmental QoL was mediated by decreased stress. There were also differences by treatment group, with stress mediating changes in environmental QoL among participants in MM, and vigor mediating changes in psychological health QoL among participants in MMCBI. Medication adherence was not associated with greater QoL after controlling for posttreatment alcohol use.
The present study identified potential mechanisms of QoL change in AUD treatment, thus contributing to the growing knowledge surrounding alternative indicators of treatment success for AUD treatment and recovery. Targeting affective states and stress during treatment may improve QoL and recovery outcomes for persons with AUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
对于酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗中的个体,许多人认为除了与饮酒相关的指标外,还应更一致地使用整体指标,如生活质量(QoL)。在 AUD 治疗前到治疗后,QoL 会增加,但机制尚不清楚。本研究探讨了积极和消极情绪在 AUD 治疗期间 QoL 变化中的作用,并进一步探讨了 QoL 变化与药物依从性之间的关系。
我们在合并药物治疗和行为干预酒精依赖研究中,对药物管理(MM;n=468)或药物管理加联合行为干预(MMCBI;n=479)治疗的参与者,检查了治疗结束时的积极情绪(即活力)和消极情绪(即压力和紧张)在基线(BL)和 26 周 QoL 之间关系中的中介作用,以及治疗结束时的积极情绪(即活力)和消极情绪(即压力和紧张)在基线(BL)和 26 周 QoL 之间关系中的中介作用。我们还探讨了 QoL 的变化是否与药物依从性有关。
心理健康 QoL 的变化是由活力(即积极情绪)的增加和压力的降低介导的,环境 QoL 的变化是由压力的降低介导的。治疗组之间也存在差异,在 MM 组中,压力介导了环境 QoL 的变化,而在 MMCBI 组中,活力介导了心理健康 QoL 的变化。在控制治疗后饮酒情况后,药物依从性与 QoL 提高无关。
本研究确定了 AUD 治疗中 QoL 变化的潜在机制,从而为 AUD 治疗和康复的替代治疗成功指标的不断增长的知识做出了贡献。在治疗期间针对情感状态和压力可能会改善 AUD 患者的 QoL 和康复结果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。