Gallagher A, Gunther M M, Bruchhaus H
School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, Republic of South Africa.
Homo. 2009;60(2):95-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2008.05.006. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
The transition to agro-pastoralism in central Europe has been framed within a dichotomy of "regional continuity" versus exogenous "demic diffusion". While substantial genetic support exists for a model of demographic diffusion from an ancestral source in the Near East, archaeological data furnish weak support for the "wave of advance" model. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence attests the widespread introduction of an exogenous "package" comprising ceramics, cereals, pulses and domesticated animals to central Europe at 5600calBCE. Body proportions are under strong climatic selection and evince remarkable stability within regional lineages. As such, they offer a viable and robust alternative to cranio-facial data in assessing hypothesised continuity and replacement with the transition to agro-pastoralism in central Europe. Humero-clavicular, brachial and crural indices in a large sample (n=75) of Linienbandkeramik (LBK), Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age specimens from the middle Elbe-Saale-Werra valley (MESV) were compared with Eurasian and African terminal Pleistocene, European Mesolithic and geographically disparate recent human specimens. Mesolithic Europeans display considerable variation in humero-clavicular and brachial indices yet none approach the extreme "hyper-polar" morphology of LBK humans from the MESV. In contrast, Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age peoples display elongated brachial and crural indices reminiscent of terminal Pleistocene and "tropically adapted" recent humans. These marked morphological changes likely reflect exogenous immigration during the terminal Fourth millennium cal BC. Population expansion and diffusion is a function of increased mobility and settlement dispersal concomitant with significant technological and subsistence changes in later Neolithic societies during the late fourth millennium cal BCE.
中欧向农牧混合经济的转变一直被置于“区域连续性”与外来“人口扩散”二分法的框架内。虽然有大量遗传学证据支持从近东祖先发源地进行人口扩散的模型,但考古数据对“推进浪潮”模型的支持力度较弱。然而,考古证据证明,在公元前5600年左右,包括陶瓷、谷物、豆类和家畜在内的外来“组合”被广泛引入中欧。身体比例受到强烈的气候选择影响,并且在区域谱系中表现出显著的稳定性。因此,在评估中欧向农牧混合经济转变过程中假设的连续性和替代情况时,它们为颅面数据提供了一种可行且有力的替代方法。对来自易北河-萨勒-韦拉河谷中部(MESV)的大量线性带纹陶(LBK)、新石器时代晚期和青铜时代早期标本(n = 75)的肩锁、臂部和腿部指数,与欧亚大陆和非洲末次冰期、欧洲中石器时代以及地理上相距甚远的现代人类标本进行了比较。中石器时代的欧洲人在肩锁和臂部指数上表现出相当大的差异,但没有一个接近MESV地区LBK人类的极端“超极地”形态。相比之下,新石器时代晚期和青铜时代早期的人群表现出拉长的臂部和腿部指数,让人联想到末次冰期和“热带适应型”现代人类。这些明显的形态变化可能反映了公元前第四个千年末期的外来移民。人口扩张和扩散是公元前第四个千年末期新石器时代晚期社会流动性增加、定居点分散以及重大技术和生存方式变化的结果。