Ketelaars Mieke P, Cuperus Juliane M, van Daal John, Jansonius Kino, Verhoeven Ludo
Department of Special Education, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):952-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
The present study examines the validity of the Dutch Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) for children in kindergarten in a community sample, in order to assess the feasibility of using it as a screening instrument in the general population. Teachers completed the CCC for a representative sample of 1396 children at kindergarten level, taken from 53 primary schools in The Netherlands. The CCC was also completed for a clinical group consisting of children with SLI in special education. Reliability as measured with internal consistency scores was found to be good for the community sample. With regard to the construct validity, a five-factor second-order factor model was found when the pragmatic subscales were analysed, which provided a reasonable fit. Criterion validity as measured using the concordance between the CCC and teacher opinions was moderate. The children identified by the CCC as having Pragmatic Language Impairment (defined as scoring below the cut off of 132) were often characterized by the teachers as having social-emotional problems, language problems or combined problems. Comparison with a clinical SLI sample showed the pragmatically impaired children in the community sample to have a profile similar to that of the clinical group of children with PLI in special education. The main difference was visible in structural language problems, which were less severe for the PLI group in mainstream education. The results of this study suggest that screening for PLI is indeed possible using the CCC.
本研究检验了荷兰儿童沟通检查表(CCC)在社区样本中对幼儿园儿童的有效性,以评估将其用作普通人群筛查工具的可行性。教师们为来自荷兰53所小学的1396名幼儿园儿童的代表性样本填写了CCC。还为一个由特殊教育中患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童组成的临床组填写了CCC。发现社区样本的内部一致性得分所衡量的信度良好。关于结构效度,在分析语用子量表时发现了一个五因素二阶因素模型,拟合度合理。使用CCC与教师意见之间的一致性所衡量的效标效度中等。被CCC鉴定为患有语用语言障碍(定义为得分低于132分的临界值)的儿童,教师通常将其描述为有社会情感问题、语言问题或综合问题。与临床SLI样本的比较表明,社区样本中语用受损的儿童与特殊教育中患有PLI的儿童临床组具有相似的特征。主要差异体现在结构语言问题上(主流教育中的PLI组情况没那么严重)。本研究结果表明,确实可以使用CCC对PLI进行筛查。