Struck Manuel F, Schmidt Thomas, Stuttmann Ralph, Hilbert Peter
Bergmannstrost Trauma Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Merseburger Strasse 165, 06110 Halle (Saale), Germany.
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2009 Mar 6;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-3-3.
Blood transfusion is a common therapy for multiple trauma patients, and is often performed soon after hospital admission. It is unclear whether the need for a blood transfusion in multiply injured patients presenting with a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, since their risk behavior differs significantly from patients with a negative BAC. In this study, we evaluated the role of blood transfusion in the treatment of BAC-positive multiple trauma patients.
In a three-year period, 164 patients at a single trauma center presented with a positive BAC, and 145 met the inclusion criteria for further evaluation and regression analysis. We compared patients who were transfused (n = 76) with those who were not transfused (n = 69).
In both groups, the most common causes of trauma were traffic accidents and falls. Most patients were admitted to the hospital from the scene of the accident (77.2%) and were male (89.0%). Transfused patients had a lower GCS (p </= .001) and her ISS (p </= .001), were more likely to have severe head injuries (p </= .001), tended to have higher BACs (p = .053), had lower hemoglobin levels and prothrombin times in the first 24 hours (p </= .001), had lower lactate levels, had higher rates of intubation (p </= .001) and ICU admission, and had longer ICU stays and artificial ventilation times (p </= .001). Mortality was significantly higher in transfused patients (n = 15 vs. n = 3, p </= .001). Non-survivors were more likely to have severe head injuries; be intubated and ventilated; be older; have higher ISS scores, lactate levels, and numbers of transfusions in the first 24 hours; and have lower GCS scores, hemoglobin measurements, and prothrombin levels. In a binary logistic regression model, only age (p = .009) and ISS (p = .004) independently predicted mortality.
In our single-center study, the BAC of multiple trauma patients and the number of blood transfusions they received did not predict mortality in multiple trauma patients if used as independent predictors. Prospective studies with greater sample sizes should be performed to clarify the role of blood transfusions in the outcome of this sub-population.
输血是多发伤患者的常见治疗方法,通常在入院后不久进行。目前尚不清楚血液酒精浓度(BAC)呈阳性的多发伤患者输血需求是否与发病率/死亡率增加相关,因为他们的风险行为与BAC阴性患者有显著差异。在本研究中,我们评估了输血在BAC阳性多发伤患者治疗中的作用。
在三年期间,单一创伤中心有164例患者BAC呈阳性,其中145例符合进一步评估和回归分析的纳入标准。我们比较了接受输血的患者(n = 76)和未接受输血的患者(n = 69)。
两组中,最常见的创伤原因是交通事故和跌倒。大多数患者从事故现场入院(77.2%),且为男性(89.0%)。接受输血的患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)较低(p≤.001),损伤严重度评分(ISS)较低(p≤.001),更有可能有严重头部损伤(p≤.001),BAC往往较高(p = .053),最初24小时血红蛋白水平和凝血酶原时间较低(p≤.001),乳酸水平较低,插管率(p≤.001)和入住重症监护病房(ICU)率较高,ICU住院时间和人工通气时间较长(p≤.001)。接受输血的患者死亡率显著更高(n = 15 vs. n = 3,p≤.001)。非幸存者更有可能有严重头部损伤;接受插管和通气;年龄较大;最初24小时ISS评分、乳酸水平和输血量较高;GCS评分、血红蛋白测量值和凝血酶原水平较低。在二元逻辑回归模型中,只有年龄(p = .009)和ISS(p = .004)独立预测死亡率。
在我们的单中心研究中,如果将多发伤患者的BAC和他们接受的输血量用作独立预测因素,它们并不能预测多发伤患者的死亡率。应进行更大样本量的前瞻性研究,以阐明输血在这一亚组患者预后中的作用。