Wiitavaara Birgitta, Björklund Martin, Brulin Christine, Djupsjöbacka Mats
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Mar 9;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-30.
Previous research has indicated neck-shoulder disorders to have a fluctuating course incorporating a variety of symptoms. These findings awoke our interest to make a comparison between symptoms experienced by people affected with the disorder and the content of questionnaires that assess pain and other symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders. Thus the aims of this study were: -to explore the symptoms experienced by people with non-specific neck-shoulder problems, as well as experiences of nuances and temporal variations (fluctuations) of symptoms; -to investigate which sources were used in the development of ten questionnaires for assessing pain and other symptoms in the neck-shoulder; -to analyse the item content of the questionnaires; -to analyse the correspondence between the item content of the questionnaires and the symptoms described by the informants.
Content analysis of interviews with 40 people with non-specific neck-shoulder pain, and 10 questionnaires used to assess pain and other symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders.
The interviews revealed a variety of symptoms indicating a bodily, mental/cognitive, and emotional engagement, and more general and severe symptoms than are usually considered in neck-shoulder questionnaires. Taking all questionnaires together many of the symptoms were considered, but most questionnaires only included a few of them. The informants were able to distinguish fluctuation of symptoms, and a variety of different qualities which were not usually considered in the questionnaires. Only two questionnaires had made use of the opinions of affected people in the development.
Few of the questionnaires had made use of the experiences of affected people in the development. The correspondence between the symptoms expressed by those affected and the content of the questionnaires was low. A variety of symptoms were expressed by the interviewees, and the participants were also able to distinguish nuances and fluctuations of symptoms. The present study points to the importance of other aspects than just pain and physical functioning as clinical trial outcome measures related to neck-shoulder disorders. To develop a condition-specific questionnaire, it is important to decide on the specific symptoms for the condition. Using the experiences of those affected, in combination with relevant research and professional knowledge, can enhance the validity of the questionnaires.
先前的研究表明,颈肩疾病病程波动,症状多样。这些发现引发了我们的兴趣,促使我们对患有该疾病的人群所经历的症状与评估颈肩疾病疼痛及其他症状的问卷内容进行比较。因此,本研究的目的是:- 探究非特异性颈肩问题患者所经历的症状,以及症状的细微差别和时间变化(波动)体验;- 调查用于开发十份评估颈肩疼痛及其他症状问卷的资料来源;- 分析问卷的项目内容;- 分析问卷项目内容与受访者描述的症状之间的对应关系。
对40名非特异性颈肩疼痛患者进行访谈的内容分析,以及10份用于评估颈肩疾病疼痛及其他症状的问卷。
访谈揭示了各种症状,表明身体、心理/认知和情感方面都受到影响,且症状比颈肩问卷中通常考虑的更为普遍和严重。综合所有问卷来看,许多症状都被提及,但大多数问卷只涵盖了其中少数几种。受访者能够区分症状的波动,以及问卷中通常未考虑的各种不同特征。只有两份问卷在开发过程中参考了患者的意见。
很少有问卷在开发过程中利用患者的经验。患者表达的症状与问卷内容之间的对应性较低。受访者表达了各种症状,参与者还能够区分症状的细微差别和波动。本研究指出,除疼痛和身体功能外,其他方面作为与颈肩疾病相关的临床试验结果指标也很重要。要开发针对特定病症的问卷,确定该病症的具体症状很重要。结合相关研究和专业知识,利用患者的经验可以提高问卷的有效性。