• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究癌症风险认知和疗效认知对癌症预防依从性及意愿的影响。

Investigating the effects of cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on cancer prevention adherence and intentions.

作者信息

Wong Norman

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-2081, USA.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2009 Mar;24(2):95-105. doi: 10.1080/10410230802676474.

DOI:10.1080/10410230802676474
PMID:19280453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2743453/
Abstract

This study examined the interaction between comparative cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on individuals' adherence for colon, prostate, and breast cancer screenings, intentions to get these screenings in the future, and intentions to adopt health lifestyle behaviors in the next year. A national probability sample of 2,226 adults ages 40 to 70 was surveyed. Overall, a positive interaction effect was found between comparative risk and efficacy on several outcomes. There were some methodological limitations worth noting, but the findings do have implications for health campaigns, particularly the need to increase efficacy beliefs about reducing cancer risks within the general population.

摘要

本研究考察了相对癌症风险与疗效认知之间的相互作用对个体进行结肠癌、前列腺癌和乳腺癌筛查的依从性、未来进行这些筛查的意愿以及下一年采取健康生活方式行为的意愿的影响。对2226名年龄在40至70岁之间的成年人进行了全国概率抽样调查。总体而言,在几个结果方面发现相对风险和疗效之间存在积极的相互作用效应。有一些方法学上的局限性值得注意,但这些发现确实对健康宣传活动有启示意义,特别是需要增强普通人群对降低癌症风险的疗效信念。

相似文献

1
Investigating the effects of cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on cancer prevention adherence and intentions.探究癌症风险认知和疗效认知对癌症预防依从性及意愿的影响。
Health Commun. 2009 Mar;24(2):95-105. doi: 10.1080/10410230802676474.
2
The relationship between prostate cancer knowledge and beliefs and intentions to attend PSA screening among at-risk men.高危男性中前列腺癌知识、信念与参加前列腺特异性抗原筛查意愿之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
3
Communicating benefits and risks of screening for prostate, colon, and breast cancer.传达前列腺癌、结肠癌和乳腺癌筛查的益处与风险。
Fam Med. 2011 Apr;43(4):248-53.
4
Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.假阳性结果对未来癌症筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Jun 1;124(11):2390-2398. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31271. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.结直肠癌筛查参与情况:与乳房X线摄影及前列腺特异性抗原筛查的比较
Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1264-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1264.
6
Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior.将跨理论模型应用于癌症筛查行为。
Am J Health Behav. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):36-56. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.4.
7
Lung cancer screening gets risk-specific.肺癌筛查针对特定风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 2;105(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs631. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
Behavioral associations between prostate and colon cancer screening.前列腺癌和结肠癌筛查之间的行为关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Feb;200(2):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.10.015.
9
Save your life: cancer screening is oversold. Know the tests to get--and those to skip.拯救你的生命:癌症筛查被过度宣传了。要知道该做哪些检查——以及哪些检查可以跳过。
Consum Rep. 2013 Mar;78(3):28-33.
10
Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.自我报告的癌症筛查史的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):748-57. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of How Physicians and Their Patients Adopt mHealth Apps in Germany: Exploratory Qualitative Study.德国医生及其患者采用移动医疗应用程序的证据:探索性定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 17;12:e48345. doi: 10.2196/48345.
2
Citizen Science Approach to Home Radon Testing, Environmental Health Literacy and Efficacy.公民科学方法在家庭氡检测、环境卫生素养与效果方面的应用
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.472. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory.基于保护动机理论的城市中国人结直肠癌筛查意向预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;19(7):4203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074203.
4
Diabetes prevention among American Indians: the role of self-efficacy, risk perception, numeracy and cultural identity.美国印第安人中的糖尿病预防:自我效能、风险认知、数字能力和文化认同的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4766-x.
5
Information seeking from media and family/friends increases the likelihood of engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors.从媒体和家人/朋友处获取信息会增加参与健康生活方式行为的可能性。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(5):527-42. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.743632. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
Cultural, economic, and psychological predictors of colonoscopy in a national sample.在全国样本中,结肠镜检查的文化、经济和心理预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1311-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1783-9. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
7
Modelling decisions to undergo genetic testing for susceptibility to common health conditions: an ancillary study of the Multiplex Initiative.对常见健康状况易感性进行基因检测的建模决策:多指标倡议的辅助研究。
Psychol Health. 2012;27(4):430-44. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.586699. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
8
Predicting breast and colon cancer screening among English-as-a-second-language older Chinese immigrant women to Canada.预测加拿大以英语为第二语言的华裔老年移民女性的乳腺癌和结肠癌筛查情况。
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0141-7.

本文引用的文献

1
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
2
Participation in Cervical Screening as a Function of Perceived Risk, Barriers and need for Cognitive Closure.参与宫颈癌筛查与感知风险、障碍以及认知闭合需求的关系。
J Health Psychol. 2002 Jan;7(1):99-105. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007001657.
3
Longitudinal Influences of Knowledge and Self-efficacy on Exercise Behavior: Tests of a Mutual Reinforcement Model.知识和自我效能对锻炼行为的纵向影响:相互增强模型的检验。
J Health Psychol. 2001 Jan;6(1):31-46. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600103.
4
Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer.传达社会比较信息对结直肠癌风险认知的影响。
J Health Commun. 2006 Jun;11(4):391-407. doi: 10.1080/10810730600671870.
5
Absolute and comparative risk perceptions as predictors of cancer worry: moderating effects of gender and psychological distress.作为癌症担忧预测因素的绝对风险和比较风险认知:性别和心理困扰的调节作用
J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:37-49. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637301.
6
The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.癌症担忧在癌症筛查中的作用:文献的理论与实证综述
Psychooncology. 2005 Jul;14(7):517-34. doi: 10.1002/pon.864.
7
Coping after cancer: risk perceptions, worry, and health behaviors among colorectal cancer survivors.癌症后的应对:结直肠癌幸存者的风险认知、担忧及健康行为
Psychooncology. 2004 Jun;13(6):367-76. doi: 10.1002/pon.751.
8
Risk perception and concern among brothers of men with prostate carcinoma.前列腺癌患者兄弟的风险认知与担忧
Cancer. 2004 Apr 1;100(7):1537-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20121.
9
Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.感知乳腺癌风险的预测因素以及感知风险与乳腺癌筛查之间的关系:一项荟萃分析综述。
Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012.
10
Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population.普通成年人群中生活方式风险因素的聚集情况。
Prev Med. 2002 Sep;35(3):219-24. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1064.