Suppr超能文献

探究癌症风险认知和疗效认知对癌症预防依从性及意愿的影响。

Investigating the effects of cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on cancer prevention adherence and intentions.

作者信息

Wong Norman

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-2081, USA.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2009 Mar;24(2):95-105. doi: 10.1080/10410230802676474.

Abstract

This study examined the interaction between comparative cancer risk and efficacy perceptions on individuals' adherence for colon, prostate, and breast cancer screenings, intentions to get these screenings in the future, and intentions to adopt health lifestyle behaviors in the next year. A national probability sample of 2,226 adults ages 40 to 70 was surveyed. Overall, a positive interaction effect was found between comparative risk and efficacy on several outcomes. There were some methodological limitations worth noting, but the findings do have implications for health campaigns, particularly the need to increase efficacy beliefs about reducing cancer risks within the general population.

摘要

本研究考察了相对癌症风险与疗效认知之间的相互作用对个体进行结肠癌、前列腺癌和乳腺癌筛查的依从性、未来进行这些筛查的意愿以及下一年采取健康生活方式行为的意愿的影响。对2226名年龄在40至70岁之间的成年人进行了全国概率抽样调查。总体而言,在几个结果方面发现相对风险和疗效之间存在积极的相互作用效应。有一些方法学上的局限性值得注意,但这些发现确实对健康宣传活动有启示意义,特别是需要增强普通人群对降低癌症风险的疗效信念。

相似文献

4
Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.假阳性结果对未来癌症筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Jun 1;124(11):2390-2398. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31271. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
Lung cancer screening gets risk-specific.肺癌筛查针对特定风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 2;105(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs631. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.自我报告的癌症筛查史的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):748-57. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验