University Witten/Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany.
Pain Med. 2009 Mar;10(2):327-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00572.x.
We studied whether or not spirituality/religiosity is a relevant resource for patients with chronic pain conditions, and to analyze interrelations between spirituality/religiosity (SpREUK Questionnaire; SpREUK is an acronym of the German translation of "Spiritual and Religious Attitudes in Dealing with Illness"), adaptive coping styles that refer to the concept of locus of disease control (AKU Questionnaire; AKU is an acronym of the German translation of "Adaptive Coping with Disease"), life satisfaction, and appraisal dimensions.
In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 580 patients with chronic pain conditions were enrolled.
We found that the patients relied on both external powerful sources of disease control and on internal powers and virtues, while Trust in Higher Source (intrinsic religiosity) or Illness as Chance (reappraisal) were valued moderately; Search for Meaningful Support/Access (spiritual quest orientation) was of minor relevance. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that the internal sources of disease control, such as Conscious and Healthy Way of Living and Positive Attitudes, were (apart from the religious denomination) the strongest predictors of patients' reliance on spirituality/religiosity. Both behavioral styles were rated significantly lower in patients who regarded themselves as neither religious nor spiritual. Positive disease interpretations such as Challenge and Value were clearly associated with a spiritual quest orientation and intrinsic religiosity.
The associations between spirituality/religiosity, positive appraisals. and internal adaptive coping strategies indicate that the utilization of spirituality/religiosity goes far beyond fatalistic acceptance, but can be regarded as an active coping process. The findings support the need for further research concerning the contributions of spiritual coping in adjustment to chronic pain.
我们研究了灵性/宗教信仰是否是慢性疼痛患者的一个相关资源,并分析了灵性/宗教信仰(SpREUK 问卷;SpREUK 是德语“处理疾病时的灵性和宗教态度”的缩写)、适应应对方式(指疾病控制的位置概念,AKU 问卷;AKU 是德语“适应疾病应对”的缩写)、生活满意度和评价维度之间的相互关系。
在一项多中心横断面研究中,共纳入了 580 名慢性疼痛患者。
我们发现,患者既依赖于外部控制疾病的强大力量,也依赖于内部的力量和美德,同时信任更高的力量(内在宗教信仰)或疾病为机会(重新评价)被适度重视;寻求有意义的支持/接触(精神探索取向)则相关性较小。逐步回归分析表明,疾病控制的内部来源,如有意识和健康的生活方式以及积极的态度,是(除宗教派别外)患者依赖灵性/宗教信仰的最强预测因素。这两种行为方式在自认为既不宗教也不精神的患者中评分明显较低。积极的疾病解释,如挑战和价值,与精神探索取向和内在宗教信仰明显相关。
灵性/宗教信仰、积极的评价与内部适应性应对策略之间的关联表明,灵性/宗教信仰的利用远远超出了宿命的接受,而可以被视为一种积极的应对过程。这些发现支持了进一步研究灵性应对在慢性疼痛适应中的贡献的必要性。