Department of Human Resources for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Mar 12;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-22.
Health facility assessments are being increasingly used to measure and monitor indicators of health workforce performance, but the global evidence base remains weak. Partly this is due to the wide variability in assessment methods and tools, hampering comparability across and within countries and over time. The World Health Organization coordinated a series of facility-based surveys using a common approach in six countries: Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Jamaica, Mozambique, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. The objectives were twofold: to inform the development and monitoring of human resources for health (HRH) policy within the countries; and to test and validate the use of standardized facility-based human resources assessment tools across different contexts.
The survey methodology drew on harmonized questionnaires and guidelines for data collection and processing. In accordance with the survey's dual objectives, this paper presents both descriptive statistics on a number of policy-relevant indicators for monitoring and evaluation of HRH as well as a qualitative assessment of the usefulness of the data collection tool for comparative analyses.
The findings revealed a large diversity in both the organization of health services delivery and, in particular, the distribution and activities of facility-based health workers across the sampled countries. At the same time, some commonalities were observed, including the importance of nursing and midwifery personnel in the skill mix and the greater tendency of physicians to engage in dual practice. While the use of standardized questionnaires offered the advantage of enhancing cross-national comparability of the results, some limitations were noted, especially in relation to the categories used for occupations and qualifications that did not necessarily conform to the country situation.
With increasing experience in health facility assessments for HRH monitoring comes greater need to establish and promote best practices regarding methods and tools for their implementation, as well as dissemination and use of the results for evidence-informed decision-making. The overall findings of multi-country facility-based survey should help countries and partners develop greater capacity to identify and measure indicators of HRH performance via this approach, and eventually contribute to better understanding of health workforce dynamics at the national and international levels.
医疗设施评估越来越多地被用于衡量和监测卫生人力绩效指标,但全球证据基础仍然薄弱。部分原因是评估方法和工具的广泛差异,阻碍了国家之间和国家内部以及随着时间推移的可比性。世界卫生组织协调了在六个国家使用共同方法进行的一系列基于设施的调查:乍得、科特迪瓦、牙买加、莫桑比克、斯里兰卡和津巴布韦。这些目标有两个:一是为国家内人力资源开发和监测提供信息;二是测试和验证在不同背景下使用标准化的基于设施的人力资源评估工具。
调查方法借鉴了协调一致的调查问卷和数据收集及处理准则。根据调查的双重目标,本文介绍了一些政策相关指标的描述性统计数据,这些指标用于监测和评估人力资源,同时还对数据收集工具进行了定性评估,以用于比较分析。
研究结果显示,抽样国家的卫生服务提供组织以及特别是基于设施的卫生工作者的分布和活动存在很大差异。同时,也观察到一些共同之处,包括护理和助产人员在技能组合中的重要性,以及医生更倾向于从事双重职业。虽然使用标准化问卷提高了结果在跨国比较中的可比性,但也注意到了一些局限性,特别是在与职业和资格使用的类别有关,这些类别不一定符合国家情况。
随着在人力资源监测方面进行医疗设施评估的经验增加,需要越来越多地建立和推广关于方法和工具的最佳实践,以及传播和使用结果,以便做出循证决策。多国家基于设施的调查的总体结果应该有助于国家和合作伙伴发展通过这种方法确定和衡量人力资源绩效指标的能力,并最终有助于更好地了解国家和国际层面的卫生劳动力动态。