McPake Barbara, Russo Giuliano, Hipgrave David, Hort Krishna, Campbell James
Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia .
Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Nova University of Lisbon, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, 1349-008, Portugal .
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):142-6. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.151894. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
Making progress towards universal health coverage (UHC) requires that health workers are adequate in numbers, prepared for their jobs and motivated to perform. In establishing the best ways to develop the health workforce, relatively little attention has been paid to the trends and implications of dual practice - concurrent employment in public and private sectors. We review recent research on dual practice for its potential to guide staffing policies in relation to UHC. Many studies describe the characteristics and correlates of dual practice and speculate about impacts, but there is very little evidence that is directly relevant to policy-makers. No studies have evaluated the impact of policies on the characteristics of dual practice or implications for UHC. We address this lack and call for case studies of policy interventions on dual practice in different contexts. Such research requires investment in better data collection and greater determination on the part of researchers, research funding bodies and national research councils to overcome the difficulties of researching sensitive topics of health systems functions.
在实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)方面取得进展,需要有足够数量的卫生工作者,为其工作做好准备并积极履行职责。在确定培养卫生人力的最佳方式时,对于双重执业(同时受雇于公共部门和私营部门)的趋势及其影响关注相对较少。我们回顾了近期关于双重执业的研究,探讨其在指导与全民健康覆盖相关的人员配置政策方面的潜力。许多研究描述了双重执业的特征及其相关因素,并推测了其影响,但几乎没有与政策制定者直接相关的证据。没有研究评估政策对双重执业特征的影响或对全民健康覆盖的影响。我们弥补这一不足,并呼吁开展不同背景下双重执业政策干预的案例研究。此类研究需要投入更多资源用于更好的数据收集,研究人员、研究资助机构和国家研究委员会也需要更坚定的决心,以克服研究卫生系统功能敏感话题的困难。