Knight Joseph, Kurtcuoglu Vartan, Muffly Karl, Marshall William, Stolzmann Paul, Desbiolles Lotus, Seifert Burkhardt, Poulikakos Dimos, Alkadhi Hatem
Laboratory of Thermodynamics in Emerging Technologies, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 3, ML J 36, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Oct;31(8):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0488-9. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
Knowledge of the normal in vivo distribution and variation of coronary ostial locations is essential in the planning of various interventional and surgical procedures. However, all studies to date have reported the distribution of coronary ostia locations only in cadaver hearts. In this study, we sought to assess the distribution of coronary ostial locations in patients using cardiac dual-source computed tomography (CT) and compare these values to those of human cadaveric specimens.
Measurements of the coronary ostia location were performed in 150 patients undergoing dual-source CT and in 75 cadavers using open measurement techniques. All 150 patients had a normal aortic valve function and no previous cardiac intervention or surgery. The location of the right and left coronary origin in relation to the aortic annulus and the height of the sinus of Valsalva were measured.
Mean ostial locations at CT were 17.0 (+/-3.6) mm and 15.3 (+/-3.1) mm for the right and left coronary ostia, with large variations of both sides (right: 10.4-28.5 mm; left: 9.8-29.3 mm). In cadavers, mean locations were 14.9 (+/-4.3) mm [5-24 mm] for right and 16.0 (+/-3.6) mm [9-24 mm] for left coronary ostia. Comparison of CT and cadaver data showed statistically significant differences for right (P < 0.0001) but not left (P = 0.1675) coronary ostia.
This study provides data of normal coronary ostial origins and demonstrates significant differences between in vivo and ex vivo measurements regarding the right coronary ostium. The observed large variations of coronary ostia origins emphasize the importance of considering such anatomic variations in the development of treatments.
了解冠状动脉开口位置的正常体内分布及变异情况对于各种介入和外科手术的规划至关重要。然而,迄今为止所有研究仅报道了冠状动脉开口位置在尸体心脏中的分布情况。在本研究中,我们试图利用心脏双源计算机断层扫描(CT)评估患者冠状动脉开口位置的分布,并将这些数值与人体尸体标本的数值进行比较。
采用开放测量技术,对150例行双源CT检查的患者和75具尸体的冠状动脉开口位置进行测量。所有150例患者主动脉瓣功能正常,既往无心脏介入或手术史。测量右冠状动脉和左冠状动脉起源相对于主动脉瓣环的位置以及主动脉窦的高度。
CT测量时,右冠状动脉开口和左冠状动脉开口的平均位置分别为17.0(±3.6)mm和15.3(±3.1)mm,两侧均有较大变异(右侧:10.4 - 28.5 mm;左侧:9.8 - 29.3 mm)。在尸体中,右冠状动脉开口的平均位置为14.9(±4.3)mm[5 - 24 mm],左冠状动脉开口的平均位置为16.0(±3.6)mm[9 - 24 mm]。CT数据与尸体数据的比较显示,右冠状动脉开口存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.0001),而左冠状动脉开口无统计学显著差异(P = 0.1675)。
本研究提供了正常冠状动脉开口起源的数据,并证明了在右冠状动脉开口方面体内测量与体外测量存在显著差异。观察到的冠状动脉开口起源的较大变异强调了在治疗方案制定中考虑此类解剖变异的重要性。