Krogstad D J, Eveland M R, Lim L L, Volberding P A, Sadler B M
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jun;35(6):1160-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.6.1160.
Twenty-three different laboratories using four different assay methods reported zidovudine (ZDV; azidothymidine) measurements in a double-blind trial of ZDV for asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 019). The risk of false-positive ZDV measurements was defined with coded specimens containing no ZDV in a quality control testing program. This testing identified six problem laboratories which reported ZDV levels of greater than or equal to 100 ng/ml for specimens with no ZDV; all of these laboratories used high-performance liquid chromatography. These six laboratories reported a disproportionately high fraction of positive assays for subjects randomized to the placebo group (31% for these 6 laboratories versus 4% for the other 17 laboratories; P less than 0.0001). The high number of false-positive ZDV results reported by these six laboratories suggested that many of the positive results that they reported for patient specimens were also false-positive results. This hypothesis was examined by retesting specimens from patients in the placebo group that had been reported as positive by these laboratories. Ninety percent (19 of 21) of these specimens were negative on retesting at the reference laboratory. These results confirm the hypothesis; they demonstrate the need for quality control testing to avoid the misinterpretation of multicenter trials because of incorrect laboratory data.
在一项针对无症状人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者的齐多夫定(ZDV;叠氮胸苷)双盲试验(艾滋病临床试验组方案019)中,23个不同实验室采用4种不同检测方法报告了齐多夫定的测量结果。在一个质量控制检测项目中,通过检测不含齐多夫定的编码样本,确定了齐多夫定测量结果出现假阳性的风险。该检测发现了6个问题实验室,这些实验室报告不含齐多夫定的样本的齐多夫定水平大于或等于100 ng/ml;所有这些实验室都使用了高效液相色谱法。这6个实验室报告的随机分配到安慰剂组的受试者的阳性检测比例过高(这6个实验室为31%,而其他17个实验室为4%;P<0.0001)。这6个实验室报告的齐多夫定假阳性结果数量众多,表明他们报告的许多患者样本阳性结果也是假阳性结果。通过对这些实验室报告为阳性的安慰剂组患者的样本进行重新检测,对这一假设进行了检验。在参考实验室重新检测时,这些样本中有90%(21个中的19个)呈阴性。这些结果证实了这一假设;它们表明需要进行质量控制检测,以避免因实验室数据错误而导致对多中心试验的错误解读。