• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整数不会自动激活其数量表征。

Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.

作者信息

Cohen Dale J

机构信息

University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC 28403-5612, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):332-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.332.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.16.2.332
PMID:19293103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2658745/
Abstract

Researchers have generally come to the conclusion that integers automatically activate the quantity they symbolize and that this quantity dominates responding. I conducted a strong test of this hypothesis with two numerical same/different experiments. On each trial, I presented the participant an integer between 1 and 9 and asked him or her to identify whether that symbol was a 5. If quantity information dominates responding, participants' reaction times (RTs) should be a function of the numerical distance between the target and the distractor. If quantity information is not activated, the integer is merely a shape, and participants' RTs should be a function of the physical similarity of the target and the distractor. The data from Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that quantity information exerts no control and that physical similarity is the primary controlling factor. These findings demonstrate that integers maintain a level of independence from their quantity representations.

摘要

研究人员普遍得出结论,整数会自动激活它们所象征的数量,并且这个数量主导反应。我通过两个数字相同/不同的实验对这一假设进行了有力测试。在每次试验中,我向参与者呈现一个1到9之间的整数,并要求他或她识别该符号是否为5。如果数量信息主导反应,参与者的反应时间(RTs)应该是目标与干扰项之间数字距离的函数。如果数量信息未被激活,整数仅仅是一种形状,参与者的RTs应该是目标与干扰项物理相似性的函数。实验1和实验2的数据表明,数量信息没有起到控制作用,物理相似性是主要的控制因素。这些发现表明,整数与其数量表征保持一定程度的独立性。

相似文献

1
Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation.整数不会自动激活其数量表征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):332-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.332.
2
Evidence for direct retrieval of relative quantity information in a quantity judgment task: decimals, integers, and the role of physical similarity.在数量判断任务中直接检索相对数量信息的证据:小数、整数和物理相似性的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1389-98. doi: 10.1037/a0020212.
3
Physical similarity (and not quantity representation) drives perceptual comparison of numbers: evidence from two Indian notations.物理相似性(而非数量表示)驱动数字的感知比较:来自两种印度记数法的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):294-300. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0212-8.
4
Across-notation automatic numerical processing.跨符号自动数字处理。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):430-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.430.
5
Cross-notational semantic priming between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerosity.符号与非符号数量之间的跨符号语义启动
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1538-52. doi: 10.1080/17470210701595530.
6
Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention.无意识掩蔽启动效应依赖于时间注意。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):416-24. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00474.
7
Semantic interference from objects both in and out of a scene context.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):171-82. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.171.
8
Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: evidence from the operational momentum effect.符号与非符号计算背后的动态表征:来自运算动量效应的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 May;71(4):803-21. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.803.
9
Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?阅读的基本过程:视觉单词识别是必需的吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):119-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03196356.
10
Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?数量表征的语义激活会影响运动参数吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Aug;189(4):379-91. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1434-5. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying conceptual neural responses to symbolic numerals.识别符号数字的概念性神经反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;291(2025):20240589. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0589. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Number Stroop Effects in Arabic Digits and ASL Number Signs: The Impact of Age and Setting of Language Acquisition.阿拉伯数字和美国手语数字符号中的数字斯特鲁普效应:年龄及语言习得环境的影响
Lang Learn Dev. 2023;19(1):95-123. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2022.2047689. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Reduced choice-confidence in negative numerals.对负向数字的选择信心降低。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0272796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272796. eCollection 2022.
4
Visual Occipito-Temporal N1 Sensitivity to Digits Across Elementary School.小学阶段视觉枕颞叶N1对数字的敏感性
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 26;16:887413. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.887413. eCollection 2022.
5
How Does the Accuracy of Children's Number Representations Influence the Accuracy of Their Numerical Predictions?儿童数字表征的准确性如何影响其数字预测的准确性?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:874230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874230. eCollection 2022.
6
Cross-Format Integration of Auditory Number Words and Visual-Arabic Digits: An ERP Study.听觉数字词与视觉阿拉伯数字的跨格式整合:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:765709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765709. eCollection 2021.
7
Visual Search Asymmetry Due to the Relative Magnitude Represented by Number Symbols.数字符号所代表的相对大小导致的视觉搜索不对称。
Vision (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;5(3):42. doi: 10.3390/vision5030042.
8
Measuring spontaneous and automatic processing of magnitude and parity information of Arabic digits by frequency-tagging EEG.通过频率标记 EEG 测量阿拉伯数字大小和奇偶性的自发和自动加工。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79404-w.
9
Further insights into the operation of the Chinese number system: Competing effects of Arabic and Mandarin number formats.对中国数字系统运作的进一步洞察:阿拉伯数字和中文数字格式的竞争效应。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1472-1483. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01065-x.
10
P300 amplitude and latency reflect arithmetic skill: An ERP study of the problem size effect.P300 波幅和潜伏期反映了算术技能:问题大小效应的 ERP 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Nov;148:107745. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107745. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Across-notation automatic numerical processing.跨符号自动数字处理。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):430-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.430.
2
Naming two-digit arabic numerals: evidence from masked priming studies.命名两位数阿拉伯数字:来自掩蔽启动研究的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1150-63. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1150.
3
Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence.依赖神经元:数字能力的神经生物学
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Mar;6(3):177-90. doi: 10.1038/nrn1626.
4
The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Sep;57(3):189-202. doi: 10.1037/h0087425.
5
Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence.数学思维的来源:行为学和脑成像证据
Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):970-4. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.970.
6
Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference.数字数量与数字同一性之间的符号距离调节斯特鲁普干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1535-45. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.5.1535.
7
Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.数字处理中的注意力、自动化及表征水平
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar;21(2):314-26. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.314.
8
Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.
Mem Cognit. 1982 Jul;10(4):389-95. doi: 10.3758/bf03202431.
9
Numerical judgments with Kanji and Kana.使用汉字和假名的数值判断。
Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(3):259-63. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90042-8.
10
Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: an additive-factors analysis.
Mem Cognit. 1980 Nov;8(6):612-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03213781.