• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体对自动化的反应差异:人格五因素模型。

Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Jun;17(2):71-96. doi: 10.1037/a0024170.

DOI:10.1037/a0024170
PMID:21688932
Abstract

This study examined the relationship of operator personality (Five Factor Model) and characteristics of the task and of adaptive automation (reliability and adaptiveness-whether the automation was well-matched to changes in task demand) to operator performance, workload, stress, and coping. This represents the first investigation of how the Five Factors relate to human response to automation. One-hundred-sixty-one college students experienced either 75% or 95% reliable automation provided with task loads of either two or four displays to be monitored. The task required threat detection in a simulated uninhabited ground vehicle (UGV) task. Task demand exerted the strongest influence on outcome variables. Automation characteristics did not directly impact workload or stress, but effects did emerge in the context of trait-task interactions that varied as a function of the dimension of workload and stress. The pattern of relationships of traits to dependent variables was generally moderated by at least one task factor. Neuroticism was related to poorer performance in some conditions, and all five traits were associated with at least one measure of workload and stress. Neuroticism generally predicted increased workload and stress and the other traits predicted decreased levels of these states. However, in the case of the relation of Extraversion and Agreeableness to Worry, Frustration, and avoidant coping, the direction of effects varied across task conditions. The results support incorporation of individual differences into automation design by identifying the relevant person characteristics and using the information to determine what functions to automate and the form and level of automation.

摘要

本研究考察了操作人员个性(五因素模型)以及任务和自适应自动化的特点(可靠性和适应性——自动化是否与任务需求的变化匹配良好)与操作人员绩效、工作量、压力和应对方式的关系。这代表了对五因素如何与人类对自动化的反应相关联的首次调查。161 名大学生经历了可靠性为 75%或 95%的自动化,提供了两个或四个显示器的任务负载进行监控。任务要求在模拟无人地面车辆 (UGV) 任务中进行威胁检测。任务需求对结果变量的影响最大。自动化特性不会直接影响工作量或压力,但在特质-任务交互的背景下,这些影响会随着工作量和压力的维度而出现。特质与因变量之间关系的模式通常至少受到一个任务因素的调节。神经质与某些条件下的较差表现有关,所有五个特质都与至少一项工作量和压力测量指标有关。神经质通常预测工作量和压力的增加,而其他特质则预测这些状态的水平降低。然而,就外向性和宜人性与担忧、挫折和回避应对的关系而言,效应的方向在任务条件之间有所不同。研究结果支持将个体差异纳入自动化设计,通过确定相关的人员特征,并利用这些信息来确定要自动化的功能以及自动化的形式和水平。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.个体对自动化的反应差异:人格五因素模型。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Jun;17(2):71-96. doi: 10.1037/a0024170.
2
Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.自动化决策辅助工具对模拟监管控制任务中的性能、操作人员行为和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 May;52(5):512-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130802379129.
3
Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.动态控制任务中自动化水平对绩效、态势感知和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 1999 Mar;42(3):462-92. doi: 10.1080/001401399185595.
4
Spatial and temporal task characteristics as stress: a test of the dynamic adaptability theory of stress, workload, and performance.作为压力的空间和时间任务特征:对应激、工作量和绩效的动态适应性理论的检验
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):471-85. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
5
Use of the RoboFlag synthetic task environment to investigate workload and stress responses in UAV operation.利用 RoboFlag 合成任务环境研究无人机操作中的工作负荷和应激反应。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):771-80. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0085-9.
6
Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.影响使用自动跟踪器的目标监测任务表现的因素。
Ergonomics. 2004 Feb 26;47(3):257-80. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001629748.
7
Cognitive demands in automation.自动化中的认知需求。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Feb;60(2):130-5.
8
Vehicle automation: a remedy for driver stress?车辆自动化:缓解驾驶员压力的良方?
Ergonomics. 2007 Aug;50(8):1302-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130701318830.
9
Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.用于多机器人控制的人机自动化交互:自动化辅助程度变化及个体差异对操作员绩效的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1033-1045. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1441449. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Coping with interpersonal stress: role of big five traits.应对人际压力:大五人格特质的作用。
J Pers. 2005 Oct;73(5):1141-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00345.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Should I Trust the Artificial Intelligence to Recruit? Recruiters' Perceptions and Behavior When Faced With Algorithm-Based Recommendation Systems During Resume Screening.我应该信任人工智能进行招聘吗?招聘人员在简历筛选过程中面对基于算法的推荐系统时的认知与行为。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:895997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895997. eCollection 2022.
2
Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments.危险区域中的信任:机器人威胁评估信心的个体差异
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:601523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.601523. eCollection 2022.
3
Measurement of Trust in Automation: A Narrative Review and Reference Guide.
自动化信任度的测量:叙述性综述与参考指南。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 19;12:604977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977. eCollection 2021.
4
Scared to Trust? - Predicting Trust in Highly Automated Driving by Depressiveness, Negative Self-Evaluations and State Anxiety.害怕信任?——通过抑郁、消极自我评价和状态焦虑预测对高度自动驾驶的信任
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;10:2917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02917. eCollection 2019.
5
A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.些许拟人化作用巨大。
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):116-133. doi: 10.1177/0018720816687205.
6
Personality Traits Moderate the Effect of Workload Sources on Perceived Workload in Flying Column Police Officers.人格特质调节飞行纵队警察工作负荷源对其工作负荷感知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01835. eCollection 2015.