Kelen G D, Green G B, Hexter D A, Fortenberry D C, Taylor E, Fleetwood D H, Sivertson K T
Division of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Oct;151(10):2051-6.
Seven months following the introduction of an institutional policy mandating compliance with universal precautions (UPs), we observed 127 health care workers performing 1421 interventions on 155 critically ill and injured patients in an emergency department setting in July 1989. Results were compared with a similar study undertaken exactly 1 year previously when UPs were considered as guidelines only. Overall adherence to UPs improved from 44.0% to 72.7% from 1 year to the next. Adherence to UPs improved from 19.5% to 55.7% during interventions on patients with profuse bleeding and from 16.7% to 54.5% during performance of major procedures. Compliance improved from 47.9% to 81.0% for emergency department-based health care workers (residents, attending physicians, nurses, x-ray film technicians). Prehospital care providers, a group not accountable to the institution, remained particularly noncompliant with only 13% adherence. We conclude that mandating UPs as policy with a monitoring component is effective in ensuring a reasonable level of adherence. However, given current barrier technology, achieving appropriate levels of compliance during unscheduled visits by patients requiring immediate attention and rapid intervention remains a challenge.
在一项强制要求遵守普遍预防措施(UPs)的机构政策实施七个月后,1989年7月,我们观察了127名医护人员在急诊科对155名重症和受伤患者进行的1421次干预措施。将结果与一年前仅将普遍预防措施视为指导方针时进行的类似研究进行了比较。总体而言,普遍预防措施的遵守率从一年前的44.0%提高到了72.7%。在对大出血患者进行干预期间,普遍预防措施的遵守率从19.5%提高到了55.7%,在进行主要手术过程中,遵守率从16.7%提高到了54.5%。急诊科医护人员(住院医师、主治医师、护士、X光片技术员)的合规率从47.9%提高到了81.0%。院前护理人员这一不受该机构约束的群体仍然特别不遵守规定,遵守率仅为13%。我们得出结论,将普遍预防措施作为一项带有监测成分的政策强制执行,对于确保合理的遵守水平是有效的。然而,鉴于当前的防护技术,在对需要立即关注和快速干预的患者进行不定期出诊期间,实现适当的合规水平仍然是一项挑战。