Kumar Kapil, Nearing Bruce D, Carvas Marcelo, Nascimento Bruno C G, Acar Mariana, Belardinelli Luiz, Verrier Richard L
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jul;20(7):796-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01437.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
In vitro studies and ambulatory ECG recordings from the MERLIN TIMI-36 clinical trial suggest that the novel antianginal agent ranolazine may have the potential to suppress atrial arrhythmias. However, there are no reports of effects of ranolazine on atrial electrophysiologic properties in large intact animals.
In 12 closed-chest anesthetized pigs, effects of intravenous ranolazine (approximately 9 microM plasma concentration) on multisite atrial effective refractory period (ERP), conduction time (CT), and duration and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiated by intrapericardial acetylcholine were investigated. Ranolazine increased ERP by a median of 45 ms (interquartile range 29-50 ms; P < 0.05, n = 6) in right and left atria compared to control at pacing cycle length (PCL) of 400 ms. However, ERP increased by only 28 (24-34) ms in right ventricle (P < 0.01, n = 6). Ranolazine increased atrial CT from 89 (71-109) ms to 98 (86-121) ms (P = 0.04, n = 6) at PCL of 400 ms. Ranolazine decreased AF duration from 894 (811-1220) seconds to 621 (549-761) seconds (P = 0.03, n = 6). AF was reinducible in 1 of 6 animals after termination with ranolazine compared with all 6 animals during control period (P = 0.07). Dominant frequency (DF) of AF was reduced by ranolazine in left atrium from 11.7 (10.7-20.5) Hz to 7.6 (2.9-8.8) Hz (P = 0.02, n = 6).
Ranolazine, at therapeutic doses, increased atrial ERP to greater extent than ventricular ERP and prolonged atrial CT in a frequency-dependent manner in the porcine heart. AF duration and DF were also reduced by ranolazine. Potential role of ranolazine in AF management merits further investigation.
来自MERLIN TIMI - 36临床试验的体外研究和动态心电图记录表明,新型抗心绞痛药物雷诺嗪可能具有抑制房性心律失常的潜力。然而,尚无关于雷诺嗪对大型完整动物心房电生理特性影响的报道。
在12只开胸麻醉猪中,研究了静脉注射雷诺嗪(血浆浓度约为9微摩尔)对多部位心房有效不应期(ERP)、传导时间(CT)以及心包内注射乙酰胆碱引发的心房颤动(AF)持续时间和诱导性的影响。与对照组相比,在起搏周期长度(PCL)为400毫秒时,雷诺嗪使右心房和左心房的ERP中位数增加45毫秒(四分位间距29 - 50毫秒;P < 0.05,n = 6)。然而,右心室的ERP仅增加28(24 - 34)毫秒(P < 0.01,n = 6)。在PCL为400毫秒时,雷诺嗪使心房CT从89(71 - 109)毫秒增加到98(86 - 121)毫秒(P = 0.04,n = 6)。雷诺嗪使AF持续时间从894(811 - 1220)秒缩短至621(549 - 761)秒(P = 0.03,n = 6)。与对照组所有6只动物在对照期均能诱发AF相比,雷诺嗪终止给药后,6只动物中有1只可再次诱发AF(P = 0.07)。雷诺嗪使左心房AF的主导频率(DF)从11.7(10.7 - 20.5)赫兹降至7.6(2.9 - 8.8)赫兹(P = 0.02,n = 6)。
在治疗剂量下,雷诺嗪在猪心脏中比心室ERP更显著地增加心房ERP,并以频率依赖性方式延长心房CT。雷诺嗪还缩短了AF持续时间并降低了DF。雷诺嗪在房颤管理中的潜在作用值得进一步研究。