Khan J A, Davis M, Graham C E, Trank J, Whitacre M M
Department of Ophthalmology, Kansas University School of Medicine, Kansas City 66103.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Oct;109(10):1444-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080100124057.
When estimating intraocular pressure in patients who are uncooperative or who have central corneal disturbances, the physician may find it either impractical or undesirable to place the small tip of a portable electronic applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen) over the central cornea. To gauge better the usefulness of Tono-Pen readings obtained from various locations, we compared such readings measured through the central cornea, midperipheral cornea, limbal cornea, and sclera of 15 cannulated eye bank eyes. Mean Tono-Pen readings from the midperipheral and clear limbal cornea did not differ significantly from central corneal readings over a 10- to 35-mm Hg range of intraocular pressures and were within +/- 2.4 mm Hg of mean central corneal readings. Mean readings taken from the sclera, however, were 8.8 to 17.0 mm Hg higher than mean central corneal readings over the 10- to 40-mm Hg range. We concluded that multiple noncentral corneal readings with the Tono-Pen provided a useful approximation of intraocular pressure, whereas scleral readings did not.
在评估不合作患者或存在中央角膜病变患者的眼压时,医生可能会发现,将便携式电子压平眼压计(Tono-Pen)的小探头置于中央角膜上,要么不切实际,要么不可取。为了更好地评估从不同位置获得的Tono-Pen读数的有效性,我们比较了通过15只已插管的眼库眼球的中央角膜、角膜中周边、角膜缘和巩膜测得的读数。在眼压为10至35mmHg的范围内,角膜中周边和透明角膜缘的Tono-Pen平均读数与中央角膜读数无显著差异,且在中央角膜平均读数的±2.4mmHg范围内。然而,在10至40mmHg的范围内,从巩膜测得的平均读数比中央角膜平均读数高8.8至17.0mmHg。我们得出结论,使用Tono-Pen进行多次非中央角膜读数可提供有用的眼压近似值,而巩膜读数则不然。