Kirkton Scott D, Howlett Richard A, Gonzalez Norberto C, Giuliano Patrick G, Britton Steven L, Koch Lauren G, Wagner Harrieth E, Wagner Peter D
Department of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Jun;106(6):1810-8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90419.2008. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
Previous studies found that selection for endurance running in untrained rats produced distinct high (HCR) and low (LCR) capacity runners. Furthermore, despite weighing 14% less, 7th generation HCR rats achieved the same absolute maximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2max)) as LCR due to muscle adaptations that improved oxygen extraction and use. However, there were no differences in cardiopulmonary function after seven generations of selection. If selection for increased endurance capacity continued, we hypothesized that due to the serial nature of oxygen delivery enhanced cardiopulmonary function would be required. In the present study, generation 15 rats selected for high and low endurance running capacity showed differences in pulmonary function. HCR, now 25% lighter than LCR, reached a 12% higher absolute Vo(2max) than LCR, P < 0.05 (49% higher Vo(2max)/kg). Despite the 25% difference in body size, both lung volume (at 20 cmH(2)O airway pressure) and exercise diffusing capacity were similar in HCR and LCR. Lung volume of LCR lay on published mammalian allometrical relationships while that of HCR lay above that line. Alveolar ventilation at Vo(2max) was 30% higher, P < 0.05 (78% higher, per kg), arterial Pco(2) was 4.5 mmHg (17%) lower, P < 0.05, while total pulmonary vascular resistance was (insignificantly) 5% lower (30% lower, per kg) in HCR. The smaller mass of HCR animals was due mostly to a smaller body frame rather than to a lower fat mass. These findings show that by generation 15, lung size in smaller HCR rats is not reduced in concert with their smaller body size, but has remained similar to that of LCR, supporting the hypothesis that continued selection for increased endurance capacity requires relatively larger lungs, supporting greater ventilation, gas exchange, and pulmonary vascular conductance.
先前的研究发现,对未经训练的大鼠进行耐力跑选择会产生明显的高耐力(HCR)和低耐力(LCR)跑步者。此外,尽管第7代HCR大鼠体重轻14%,但由于肌肉适应性改善了氧气提取和利用,其绝对最大耗氧量(Vo₂max)与LCR相同。然而,经过七代选择后,心肺功能并无差异。如果继续选择提高耐力能力,我们推测由于氧气输送的连续性,将需要增强心肺功能。在本研究中,选择用于高耐力和低耐力跑步能力的第15代大鼠表现出肺功能差异。HCR大鼠现在比LCR大鼠轻25%,其绝对Vo₂max比LCR大鼠高12%,P<0.05(Vo₂max/kg高49%)。尽管体型相差25%,但HCR和LCR大鼠的肺容量(在气道压力20 cmH₂O时)和运动弥散能力相似。LCR大鼠的肺容量符合已发表的哺乳动物异速生长关系,而HCR大鼠的肺容量则高于该线。在Vo₂max时,肺泡通气量高30%,P<0.05(每千克高78%),动脉血Pco₂低4.5 mmHg(17%),P<0.05,而HCR大鼠的总肺血管阻力(不显著)低5%(每千克低30%)。HCR动物体重较小主要是由于体型较小,而非脂肪量较低。这些发现表明,到第15代时,体型较小的HCR大鼠的肺大小并未与其较小的体型同步减小,而是与LCR大鼠的肺大小保持相似,支持了持续选择提高耐力能力需要相对较大的肺以支持更大的通气、气体交换和肺血管传导性这一假设。