Henderson Kyle K, Wagner Harrieth, Favret Fabrice, Britton Steven L, Koch Lauren G, Wagner Peter D, Gonzalez Norberto C
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7401, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Oct;93(4):1265-74. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00809.2001.
O(2) transport during maximal exercise was studied in rats bred for extremes of exercise endurance, to determine whether maximal O(2) uptake (VO(2 max)) was different in high- (HCR) and low-capacity runners (LCR) and, if so, which were the phenotypes responsible for the difference. VO(2 max) was determined in five HCR and six LCR female rats by use of a progressive treadmill exercise protocol at inspired PO(2) of approximately 145 (normoxia) and approximately 70 Torr (hypoxia). Normoxic VO(2 max) (in ml. min(-1). kg(-1)) was 64.4 +/- 0.4 and 57.6 +/- 1.5 (P < 0.05), whereas VO(2 max) in hypoxia was 42.7 +/- 0.8 and 35.3 +/- 1.5 (P < 0.05) in HCR and LCR, respectively. Lack of significant differences between HCR and LCR in alveolar ventilation, alveolar-to-arterial PO(2) difference, or lung O(2) diffusing capacity indicated that neither ventilation nor efficacy of gas exchange contributed to the difference in VO(2 max) between groups. Maximal rate of blood O(2) convection (cardiac output times arterial blood O(2) content) was also similar in both groups. The major difference observed was in capillary-to-tissue O(2) transfer: both the O(2) extraction ratio (0.81 +/- 0.002 in HCR, 0.74 +/- 0.009 in LCR, P < 0.001) and the tissue diffusion capacity (1.18 +/- 0.09 in HCR and 0.92 +/- 0.05 ml. min(-1). kg(-1). Torr(-1) in LCR, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in HCR. The data indicate that selective breeding for exercise endurance resulted in higher VO(2 max) mostly associated with a higher transfer of O(2) at the tissue level.
对具有极端运动耐力的品系大鼠在最大运动期间的氧气运输进行了研究,以确定高耐力跑步者(HCR)和低耐力跑步者(LCR)的最大摄氧量(VO₂max)是否存在差异,如果存在差异,哪些表型导致了这种差异。通过在吸入氧分压约为145(常氧)和约70 Torr(低氧)的情况下使用渐进式跑步机运动方案,测定了5只HCR和6只LCR雌性大鼠的VO₂max。常氧下的VO₂max(以ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹计)在HCR中为64.4±0.4,在LCR中为57.6±1.5(P<0.05),而在低氧条件下,HCR和LCR的VO₂max分别为42.7±0.8和35.3±1.5(P<0.05)。HCR和LCR在肺泡通气、肺泡-动脉氧分压差或肺氧气扩散能力方面无显著差异,这表明通气和气体交换效率均未导致两组之间VO₂max的差异。两组的最大血液氧气对流速率(心输出量乘以动脉血氧气含量)也相似。观察到的主要差异在于毛细血管到组织的氧气转移:氧气提取率(HCR中为0.81±0.002,LCR中为0.74±0.009,P<0.001)和组织扩散能力(HCR中为1.18±0.09,LCR中为0.92±0.05 ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹·Torr⁻¹,P<0.01)在HCR中均显著更高。数据表明,对运动耐力进行选择性育种导致VO₂max升高,这主要与组织水平上更高的氧气转移有关。