Dolgov Igor, Birchfield David A, McBeath Michael K, Thornburg Harvey, Todd Christopher G
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):523-9. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.523.
Recent research confirms that observers' judgments of projected final destinations of axis-trajectory misaligned moving figures are biased in the direction of primary axis deviation from trajectory, a phenomenon we named the axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias. The present study tests whether this bias occurs in a large, immersive mixed-reality environment that enables active (mobile) responses in making judgments of shapes' destinations. Like Morikawa (1999), we found that accuracy depended on axis-trajectory alignment and that there was a correspondence between final destination judgment error and the direction of axial deviation from the trajectory. Extending prior work, we found that comobile judgments were significantly more accurate than stationary ones for symmetric moving shapes, regardless of axial deviation, but only marginally so for asymmetric shapes. We conclude that our findings are ecologically consistent and that AAM is a natural regularity for which people have acquired a complementary perceptual-cognitive attunement: the AAM bias.
最近的研究证实，观察者对轴线轨迹未对齐的移动图形的预计最终目的地的判断，会朝着轴线偏离轨迹的方向产生偏差，我们将这一现象命名为轴线对齐运动（AAM）偏差。本研究测试了这种偏差是否会出现在一个大型的、沉浸式混合现实环境中，该环境能够让人们在对形状的目的地进行判断时做出主动（移动）反应。与森川（1999年）的研究一样，我们发现准确性取决于轴线与轨迹的对齐情况，并且最终目的地判断误差与轴线偏离轨迹的方向之间存在对应关系。在先前研究的基础上进行拓展，我们发现，对于对称移动形状，无论轴向偏差如何，共同移动时的判断都比静止时显著更准确，但对于不对称形状，只是略微更准确一些。我们得出结论，我们的研究结果在生态学上是一致的，并且AAM是一种自然规律，人们已经为此获得了一种互补的感知 - 认知协调：AAM偏差。
