• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为医疗保健政策制定和管理提供信息：综合的作用。

Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.

作者信息

Pope Catherine, Mays Nicholas, Popay Jennie

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southampton, Highfield, England.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):43-8.

PMID:19305652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2585321/
Abstract

Research synthesis has an important role supporting the transfer of knowledge between researchers and healthcare decision-makers. But if our goal is to make knowledge more useable and context specific, then extending the scope of systematic reviews or producing syntheses with policy makers and managers may be insufficient. Dialogues, partnerships and reinterpretations of evidence in context will help us achieve this goal.

摘要

研究综合在支持研究人员与医疗保健决策者之间的知识转移方面发挥着重要作用。但如果我们的目标是使知识更具实用性且针对具体情境，那么扩大系统评价的范围或与政策制定者及管理人员进行综合分析可能并不够。在具体情境中进行对话、建立伙伴关系以及重新解读证据将有助于我们实现这一目标。

相似文献

1
Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.为医疗保健政策制定和管理提供信息：综合的作用。
Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):43-8.
2
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.证据总结能否增加卫生政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用？一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018.
3
Living evidence and adaptive policy: perfect partners?活的证据和适应性政策：完美搭档？
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01085-4.
4
Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.落实研究：为决策者提供情境化证据综合的创新方法。
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;6(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0606-4.
5
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.迈向为医疗保健管理和政策制定提供信息的系统评价。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308549.
6
How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study.研究人员和政策制定者之间的循证生成伙伴关系如何在实践中实施？一项定性访谈研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0441-2.
7
Health researchers and policy makers involvement in knowledge translation activities in Malawi.马拉维卫生研究人员和政策制定者参与知识转化活动。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Jun 28;33(4):380-395. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2019-0008. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews.评估针对卫生政策制定者和管理者的知识传播和传播策略的影响：系统评价概述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 6;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00780-4.
9
Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis.运用研究为医疗保健管理者和政策制定者的问题提供信息：从总结性综合到解释性综合。
Healthc Policy. 2005 Sep;1(1):55-71.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.父母对家庭体育活动干预措施的体验：一项系统评价与定性证据综合分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01778-9.
2
Effectiveness of infrastructural interventions to improve access to safe drinking water in Latin America and the Caribbean on the burden of diarrhoea in children <5 years: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区改善5岁以下儿童安全饮用水供应的基础设施干预措施对腹泻负担的有效性：系统文献综述与叙述性综合分析
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2451610. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2451610. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Towards stronger tobacco control policies to curb the smoking epidemic in Spain.迈向更有力的烟草控制政策，遏制西班牙的吸烟流行。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Jul;26(7):1561-1569. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03385-9. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Is equity considered in systematic reviews of interventions for mitigating social isolation and loneliness in older adults?系统评价干预措施以减轻老年人社会隔离和孤独感时是否考虑公平性？
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):2241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14667-8.
5
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.在干预措施的系统评价中如何评估对健康公平性的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 18;1(1):MR000028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000028.pub3.
6
Formative research to develop a school-based, community-linked physical activity role model programme for girls: CHoosing Active Role Models to INspire Girls (CHARMING).形成性研究：为女孩开发基于学校、社区联系的身体活动榜样项目：选择积极榜样激励女孩（CHARMING）。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6741-1.
7
What's Measured Is Not Necessarily What Matters: A Cautionary Story from Public Health.所衡量的未必是重要的：一个来自公共卫生领域的警示故事。
Healthc Policy. 2016 Nov;12(2):52-64.
8
Improving the well-being of children and youths: a randomized multicomponent, school-based, physical activity intervention.改善儿童和青少年的福祉：一项随机多组分、基于学校的体育活动干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3794-2.
9
How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.语境和问题如何影响政策相关研究综述的使用：批判性综合解释。
Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):604-48. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12026.
10
Mining the management literature for insights into implementing evidence-based change in healthcare.挖掘管理文献以获取关于在医疗保健中实施循证变革的见解。
Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):33-48.

本文引用的文献

1
Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis.运用研究为医疗保健管理者和政策制定者的问题提供信息：从总结性综合到解释性综合。
Healthc Policy. 2005 Sep;1(1):55-71.
2
Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.在Cochrane协作网内部及外部开展工作，以使系统评价对医疗保健管理人员和政策制定者更有用。
Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):21-33.
3
Recognizing the needs and roles of the key actors.认识关键行为者的需求和作用。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:53-4. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308558.
4
Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field.系统地审查定性和定量证据，以为卫生领域的管理和决策提供信息。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308576.
5
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.综合定性和定量证据：对可能方法的综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jan;10(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/135581960501000110.
6
Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.将系统评价方法应用于关于人们观点的研究：来自公共卫生研究的一个例子。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):794-800. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014829.
7
Research implications of science-informed, value-based decision making.基于科学信息和价值的决策的研究意义。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):83-90.
8
Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence.影响儿童免疫接种率的因素：定性与定量证据的贝叶斯综合分析
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1596-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11560-1.
9
Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review.女性对孕期超声检查的看法：一项系统综述。
Birth. 2002 Dec;29(4):225-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00198.x.
10
How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making.政策制定者如何运用证据？研究利用模型与当地国民保健服务体系的政策制定
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):461-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.461.