• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高频听力损失患者的助听器使用效果

Hearing aid outcomes for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.

作者信息

Roup Christina M, Noe Colleen M

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2009 Jun;18(1):45-52. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0028). Epub 2009 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0028)
PMID:19307291
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether listeners with primarily high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (HF SNHL) perceived benefit from amplification provided by completely-in-the-canal (CIC) hearing aids.

METHOD

The Hearing Handicap for the Elderly-Screening version, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and the Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life questionnaires were mailed to 2 groups of listeners (n = 79) who matched preset criteria, including threshold at 2000 Hz and use of CIC amplification. Sixty-seven percent (n = 53) of the questionnaires were returned and were divided into 2 groups. Group I (n = 26) consisted of listeners with normal hearing through 2000 Hz, and Group II (n = 27) consisted of listeners with normal hearing only through 1000 Hz.

RESULTS

Results revealed that both groups perceived significant hearing handicap, hearing aid benefit, and hearing aid satisfaction. Differences between the 2 groups on the 3 measures, however, were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Listeners with HF SNHL perceived benefit and satisfaction from amplification with CIC hearing aids. Individuals with SNHL limited to the high frequencies should be considered candidates for amplification.

摘要

目的

确定主要患有高频感音神经性听力损失(HF SNHL)的听力受损者是否能从耳道式(CIC)助听器提供的放大功能中获益。

方法

将《老年人听力障碍筛查版》《助听器效益简要概况》和《日常生活中对放大功能的满意度》问卷邮寄给两组符合预设标准的听力受损者(n = 79),这些标准包括2000赫兹处的听阈以及使用CIC放大功能。67%(n = 53)的问卷被收回,并分为两组。第一组(n = 26)由2000赫兹听力正常的听力受损者组成,第二组(n = 27)由仅1000赫兹听力正常的听力受损者组成。

结果

结果显示两组都感受到了显著的听力障碍、助听器效益和助听器满意度。然而,两组在这三项指标上的差异无统计学意义。

结论

患有HF SNHL的听力受损者从CIC助听器的放大功能中获得了益处和满意度。高频受限的感音神经性听力损失患者应被视为放大功能的适用对象。

相似文献

1
Hearing aid outcomes for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.高频听力损失患者的助听器使用效果
Am J Audiol. 2009 Jun;18(1):45-52. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0028). Epub 2009 Mar 23.
2
The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.性能-感知测试(PPT)及其与助听器报告的听力障碍和助听器满意度的关系。
Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):229-42. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215976.64444.e6.
3
The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.高频放大对不同程度高频听力损失的听力仪器使用者的客观和主观性能的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Jun;49(3):616-27. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/044).
4
Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.用于高频感音神经性听力损失的数字助听器:RetroX 设备的初步经验
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Jul;125(7):693-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480510043396.
5
[The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].[使用自我评估问卷评估助听器效果]
Pro Fono. 2004 Jan-Apr;16(1):101-10.
6
High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss.听力正常至中度听力损失者的高频放大与音质
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):160-72. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/012).
7
Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly?有经验的助听器使用者知道如何正确使用他们的助听器吗?
Am J Audiol. 2009 Jun;18(1):69-76. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2009/08-0022). Epub 2009 Apr 20.
8
Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.听力图呈陡坡状的听众的频率压缩结果。
Int J Audiol. 2006 Nov;45(11):619-29. doi: 10.1080/14992020600825508.
9
Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.老年人助听器效果的测量:年轻老年人与年长老年人的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jun;138(6):730-4. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.012.
10
Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.获得性单侧感音神经性听力损失患者使用骨锚式助听器(Baha)系统的长期获益及满意度
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Dec;29(8):1123-31. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of pure tone thresholds using the speech reception threshold and age in elderly individuals with hearing loss.使用言语接受阈和年龄预测听力损失老年人的纯音阈值。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Apr 17;17(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06762-3.
2
Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models.颠覆性听力技术与轻度感音神经性听力损失II:关于经济适用型听力技术及直接面向消费者模式的当前研究
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):146-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641741. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
3
A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools.
自 1999 年以来,对测量和报告老年人助听器使用情况的研究进行系统评价:测量工具的描述性总结。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031831. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Cultural adaptation of the SADL (satisfaction with amplification in daily life) questionaire for Brazilian Portuguese.SADL(日常生活中助听满意度)问卷的巴西葡萄牙语文化适应性调整。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep-Oct;77(5):563-72. doi: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000500005.