Moore Jason, Ramakrishna Satish, Tan Kay, Cockwell Paul, Eardley Kevin, Little Mark A, Rylance Paul, Shivakumar Kunigal, Suresh Vijayan, Tomlinson Kerry, Ready Andrew, Borrows Richard
Renal Institute of Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Transplantation. 2009 Feb 27;87(4):578-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181949e71.
The early identification of kidney allografts at risk of later dysfunction has implications for clinical practice. Donor quality scoring systems (preoperative) and measures of early allograft function (first week postoperative) have previously shown practical utility. This study aimed to determine the optimal parameter(s) (preoperative and postoperative) with greatest predictive power for the development of subsequent allograft dysfunction.
Consecutive deceased donor renal transplants (n=217) were studied. In each, the following measures were assessed: Preoperative donor quality scores: expanded criteria donor status; Deceased Donor Score (Nyberg et al., Am J Transplant 2003;3:715); Donor Risk Score (Schold et al., Am J Transplant 2005; 5(4 pt 1): 757); and delayed graft function (DGF) Nomogram (Irish et al., J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2967). Postoperative early function measures: dialysis requirement and duration; extended DGF definition (Boom et al., Kidney Int 2000; 58: 859); creatinine at day 5 and day 7; creatinine reduction ratios at day 2 and day 7; and urine output posttransplantation. Primary outcome measures were creatinine at 12 months and the development of chronic kidney disease stage 4T.
Of donor scoring systems, Donor Risk Score was best associated with subsequent allograft function. Of early function measures: the extended definition of DGF, creatinine at day 5, and dialysis duration showed greatest predictive power in the patient population overall, those not requiring postoperative dialysis, and those requiring dialysis, respectively. No scores or early function measures were associated with change in creatinine between 6 and 12 months.
This study validates and identifies the optimal early predictive parameter available for kidney transplant recipients, with implications for refining early postoperative management and potential utility in organ allocation policy.
早期识别有后期功能障碍风险的肾移植受者对临床实践具有重要意义。供体质量评分系统(术前)和早期移植肾功能指标(术后第一周)此前已显示出实际应用价值。本研究旨在确定对后续移植肾功能障碍发生具有最大预测能力的最佳参数(术前和术后)。
对连续的尸体供肾肾移植患者(n = 217)进行研究。对每例患者评估以下指标:术前供体质量评分:扩大标准供体状态;死亡供体评分(Nyberg等人,《美国移植杂志》2003年;3:715);供体风险评分(Schold等人,《美国移植杂志》2005年;5(4 pt 1):757);以及延迟移植肾功能(DGF)列线图(Irish等人,《美国肾脏病学会杂志》2003年;14:2967)。术后早期功能指标:透析需求及持续时间;扩展的DGF定义(Boom等人,《肾脏国际》2000年;58:859);术后第5天和第7天的肌酐水平;术后第2天和第7天的肌酐清除率;以及移植后尿量。主要结局指标为术后12个月的肌酐水平及慢性肾脏病4T期的发生情况。
在供体评分系统中,供体风险评分与后续移植肾功能的相关性最佳。在早期功能指标中:DGF的扩展定义、术后第5天的肌酐水平以及透析持续时间分别在总体患者人群、无需术后透析的患者以及需要透析的患者中显示出最大的预测能力。没有评分或早期功能指标与术后6至12个月肌酐水平的变化相关。
本研究验证并确定了可用于肾移植受者的最佳早期预测参数,这对优化术后早期管理具有重要意义,并可能在器官分配政策中具有潜在应用价值。