Marsh Elizabeth J, Agarwal Pooja K, Roediger Henry L
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 9 Flowers Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Mar;15(1):1-11. doi: 10.1037/a0014721.
Many thousands of students take standardized tests every year. In the current research, we asked whether answering standardized test questions affects students' later test performance. Prior research has shown both positive and negative effects of multiple-choice testing on later tests, with negative effects arising from students selecting incorrect alternatives on multiple-choice tests and then believing they were correct (Roediger & Marsh, 2005). In the current experiments, undergraduates and high school students answered multiple-choice questions retired from SAT II tests (that are no longer in the testing pool) on biology, chemistry, U.S. history, and world history, and later answered cued-recall questions about these subjects. In 3 experiments, we observed positive testing effects: More final cued-recall questions were answered correctly if the items had appeared on the initial multiple-choice test. We also sometimes observed negative testing effects: intrusions of multiple-choice distractors as answers on the final cued-recall test. Students who scored well on the initial test benefited from taking the test, but lower achieving students showed either less benefit (undergraduates) or costs from the testing (high school students).
每年都有成千上万的学生参加标准化考试。在当前的研究中,我们探讨了回答标准化考试问题是否会影响学生后续的考试成绩。先前的研究表明,多项选择题测试对后续考试既有积极影响也有消极影响,消极影响源于学生在多项选择题测试中选择了错误选项,然后认为自己的选择是正确的(罗德尼格和马什,2005年)。在当前的实验中,本科生和高中生回答了从SAT II考试(已不再在测试题库中)中选取的关于生物、化学、美国历史和世界历史的多项选择题,随后回答了关于这些科目的线索回忆问题。在3项实验中,我们观察到了积极的测试效应:如果题目出现在最初的多项选择题测试中,那么在最后的线索回忆测试中会有更多问题被正确回答。我们有时也观察到了消极的测试效应:在最后的线索回忆测试中,多项选择题的干扰项会作为答案出现。在初始测试中成绩较好的学生从参加测试中受益,但成绩较差的学生要么受益较少(本科生),要么因测试而付出代价(高中生)。