Suppr超能文献

多项选择题测试的正负后果。

The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

作者信息

Roediger Henry L, Marsh Elizabeth J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1155-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155.

Abstract

Multiple-choice tests are commonly used in educational settings but with unknown effects on students' knowledge. The authors examined the consequences of taking a multiple-choice test on a later general knowledge test in which students were warned not to guess. A large positive testing effect was obtained: Prior testing of facts aided final cued-recall performance. However, prior testing also had negative consequences. Prior reading of a greater number of multiple-choice lures decreased the positive testing effect and increased production of multiple-choice lures as incorrect answers on the final test. Multiple-choice testing may inadvertently lead to the creation of false knowledge.

摘要

多项选择题测试在教育环境中普遍使用,但对学生知识的影响尚不清楚。作者研究了参加多项选择题测试对随后的常识测试的影响,在常识测试中,学生被警告不要猜测。获得了很大的积极测试效应:对事实的先前测试有助于最终的线索回忆表现。然而,先前测试也有负面影响。预先阅读大量多项选择题的干扰项会降低积极测试效应,并增加在最终测试中作为错误答案的多项选择题干扰项的出现。多项选择题测试可能会无意中导致错误知识的产生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验