• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《纪念谵妄评估量表-泰语版(MDAS-T)评估姑息治疗患者谵妄的有效性和可靠性》。

Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai Version (MDAS-T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients.

机构信息

Siriraj Palliative Care Center, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department Psychiatry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e335-e340. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399
PMID:32043769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7011635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium, a neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs throughout medical illness trajectories, is frequently misdiagnosed. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a commonly used tool in palliative care (PC) settings. Our objective was to establish and validate the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai version (MDAS-T) in PC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MDAS was translated into Thai. Content validity, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency were explored. The construct validity of the MDAS-T was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. Instrument testing of the MDAS-T, the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU-T), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition as the gold standard was performed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. The duration of each assessment was recorded.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 194 patients. The content validity index was 0.97. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. A principal component analysis indicated a homogeneous, one-factor structure. The area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the MDAS-T were 0.92 (0.85-0.96) and 0.90 (0.82-0.94), respectively, with a cutoff score of 9, whereas the CAM-ICU-T yielded 0.58 (0.48-0.67) and 0.98 (0.93-0.99), respectively. The median MDAS-T assessment time was 5 minutes.

CONCLUSION

This study established and validated the MDAS-T as a good and feasible tool for delirium screening and severity rating in PC settings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Delirium is prevalent in palliative care (PC) settings and causes distress to patients and families, thereby making delirium screening necessary. This study found that the MDAS-T is a highly objective and feasible test for delirium screening and severity monitoring in PC settings and can greatly improve the quality of care for this population.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种在整个疾病过程中发生的神经精神综合征,经常被误诊。《纪念谵妄评估量表》(MDAS)是姑息治疗(PC)环境中常用的工具。我们的目的是建立和验证 MDAS-泰文版(MDAS-T)在 PC 患者中的适用性。

材料与方法

MDAS 被翻译成泰文。内容效度、评定者间信度和内部一致性进行了探讨。使用探索性因子分析对 MDAS-T 的结构效度进行了分析。使用 MDAS-T、泰国版重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU-T)和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版作为金标准对 MDAS-T 进行了仪器测试。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线用于确定最佳截断分数。记录了每次评估的持续时间。

结果

研究纳入了 194 名患者。内容效度指数为 0.97。组内相关系数和克朗巴赫's α系数分别为 0.98 和 0.96。主成分分析表明具有同质的单因素结构。ROC 曲线下面积为 0.96(95%置信区间[CI],0.93-0.99)。MDAS-T 的最佳灵敏度和特异性(95%CI)组合分别为 0.92(0.85-0.96)和 0.90(0.82-0.94),截断值为 9,而 CAM-ICU-T 分别为 0.58(0.48-0.67)和 0.98(0.93-0.99)。MDAS-T 的中位评估时间为 5 分钟。

结论

本研究建立并验证了 MDAS-T 作为一种在姑息治疗环境中用于谵妄筛查和严重程度评分的良好且可行的工具。

实践意义

谵妄在姑息治疗(PC)环境中很常见,会给患者和家属带来痛苦,因此有必要进行谵妄筛查。本研究发现,MDAS-T 是一种用于 PC 环境中谵妄筛查和严重程度监测的高度客观和可行的测试,可以大大提高该人群的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ec/7011635/b2551e279c78/ONCO-25-e335-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ec/7011635/b2551e279c78/ONCO-25-e335-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ec/7011635/b2551e279c78/ONCO-25-e335-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai Version (MDAS-T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients.《纪念谵妄评估量表-泰语版(MDAS-T)评估姑息治疗患者谵妄的有效性和可靠性》。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e335-e340. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients.验证一般医疗机构患者的《谵妄评估量表》中文版。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;14(1):e12468. doi: 10.1111/appy.12468. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery.使用中文版的纪念谵妄评估量表来描述髋关节手术后的术后谵妄。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;6:297. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00297. eCollection 2014.
4
Clinical utility, factor analysis, and further validation of the memorial delirium assessment scale in patients with advanced cancer: Assessing delirium in advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者中纪念谵妄评估量表的临床效用、因素分析及进一步验证:评估晚期癌症中的谵妄
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2859-67.
5
Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).泰国版重症监护室意识模糊评估法(CAM-ICU)的有效性和可靠性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 29;9:879-85. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S62660. eCollection 2014.
6
Delirium and its consequences in the specialized palliative care unit: Validation of the Korean version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.谵妄及其在专科姑息治疗病房的后果:《纪念谵妄评估量表》韩文版的验证。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jan;28(1):160-166. doi: 10.1002/pon.4926. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
First Spanish version of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale: psychometric properties, responsiveness, and factor loadings.《纪念谵妄评估量表》首个西班牙语版本:心理测量特性、反应性及因子载荷
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
8
Validation of memorial delirium assessment scale.纪念谵妄评估量表的验证。
J Crit Care. 2009 Dec;24(4):530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.12.016. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
9
The Diagnostic Sensitivity of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Spanish Version.《纪念谵妄评估量表西班牙语版的诊断灵敏度》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):968-972. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Evaluation of the memorial delirium assessment scale (MDAS) for the screening of delirium by means of simulated cases by palliative care health professionals.姑息治疗医护人员通过模拟病例对纪念谵妄评估量表(MDAS)用于谵妄筛查的评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Nov;15(11):1271-1276. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0247-6. Epub 2007 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting delirium in Parkinson's disease: an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of bedside tools.帕金森病中谵妄的检测:床边工具诊断准确性的评估
Age Ageing. 2025 Jul 1;54(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf197.
2
The Confusion Assessment Method Could Be More Accurate than the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale for Diagnosing Delirium in Older Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study.《混乱评估方法可能比纪念谵妄评估量表更能准确诊断老年癌症患者的谵妄:一项探索性研究》。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;30(9):8245-8254. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090598.
3
Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer-A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting.在姑息治疗环境下的谵妄的临床评估和管理。
Drugs. 2017 Oct;77(15):1623-1643. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0804-3.
2
The frequency of missed delirium in patients referred to palliative care in a comprehensive cancer center.在一家综合癌症中心接受姑息治疗的患者中,谵妄漏诊的发生率。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2427-33. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2610-3. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
3
Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery.
癌症老年患者谵妄筛查工具的准确性——一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 17;15(10):2807. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102807.
4
The prevalence, associated factors, clinical impact, and state of diagnosis of delirium in palliative care patients.在姑息治疗患者中谵妄的流行率、相关因素、临床影响和诊断状况。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7949-7956. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06367-7. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Effect of Melatonin on Delirium After on-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.褪黑素对体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后谵妄的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Iran J Med Sci. 2021 Mar;46(2):120-127. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.82860.1146.
使用中文版的纪念谵妄评估量表来描述髋关节手术后的术后谵妄。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;6:297. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00297. eCollection 2014.
4
Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study.增加潜类分析中的指标是有益还是有害?一项蒙特卡罗研究的结果。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00920. eCollection 2014.
5
Delirium in patients with cancer: assessment, impact, mechanisms and management.癌症患者的谵妄:评估、影响、机制和管理。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;12(2):77-92. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.147. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).泰国版重症监护室意识模糊评估法(CAM-ICU)的有效性和可靠性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 29;9:879-85. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S62660. eCollection 2014.
7
Practical assessment of delirium in palliative care.姑息治疗中谵妄的实践评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):176-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.024. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
An analytical framework for delirium research in palliative care settings: integrated epidemiologic, clinician-researcher, and knowledge user perspectives.姑息治疗环境中谵妄研究的分析框架:综合流行病学、临床研究人员和知识使用者的视角
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Aug;48(2):159-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.245. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
9
Assessment scales for delirium: A review.谵妄评估量表:综述。
World J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 22;2(4):58-70. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i4.58.
10
Delirium in elderly people.老年人谵妄。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.