Pouratian Nader, Crowley R Webster, Sherman Jonathan H, Jagannathan Jay, Sheehan Jason P
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2009 Sep;94(3):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9873-9. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
Despite a randomized trial showing no benefit of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) prior to radiation therapy (RT), the benefits of SRS after RT and at the time of progression require further characterization. We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with histopathological diagnoses of glioblastoma (GBM) that were treated with SRS over a 16-year period (1991-2007). Twenty-two were treated as part of their initial treatment paradigm and 26 were treated at the time of progression. The primary endpoints studied were overall survival (OS), survival after SRS and time-to-progression (TTP). Patients treated at the time of progression had significantly longer OS than those treated on initial presentation (17.4 vs. 15.1 months, P = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) class III patients, those with more extensive resections, and those who were not on steroids at the time of SRS had significantly improved OS. SRS margin dose was a significant prognostic factor for TTP on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98). In the subgroup of patients treated with GKS as part of their initial treatment, an increasing number of weeks between surgical resection and GKS was a poor prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23). In patients who were treated with SRS at the time of progression, chemotherapy was associated with a longer TTP (P = 0.028). Our results suggest that SRS provides a survival advantage when delivered after RT. This benefit may be best appreciated in RTOG class III patients. Moreover, SRS may be a viable alternative to open surgery for aggressive management of GBM at the time of recurrence. Prospective studies of SRS for GBM should focus on these two groups of patients.
尽管一项随机试验表明立体定向放射外科(SRS)在放射治疗(RT)之前并无益处,但RT后及病情进展时SRS的益处仍需进一步明确。我们回顾性分析了48例经组织病理学诊断为胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的患者,这些患者在16年期间(1991 - 2007年)接受了SRS治疗。22例作为初始治疗方案的一部分接受治疗,26例在病情进展时接受治疗。研究的主要终点为总生存期(OS)、SRS后的生存期和疾病进展时间(TTP)。病情进展时接受治疗的患者OS明显长于初始就诊时接受治疗的患者(17.4个月对15.1个月,P = 0.003)。多因素分析显示,放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)III级患者、手术切除范围更广的患者以及SRS时未使用类固醇的患者OS显著改善。多因素分析中,SRS边缘剂量是TTP的显著预后因素(HR = 0.78,95% CI:0.62 - 0.98)。在作为初始治疗一部分接受GKS治疗的患者亚组中,手术切除与GKS之间间隔周数增加在多因素分析中是不良预后因素(HR = 1.11,95% CI:1.01 - 1.23)。在病情进展时接受SRS治疗的患者中,化疗与更长的TTP相关(P = 0.028)。我们的结果表明,RT后进行SRS可提供生存优势。这种益处可能在RTOG III级患者中最为明显。此外,对于复发性GBM的积极治疗,SRS可能是开放手术的可行替代方案。GBM的SRS前瞻性研究应聚焦于这两组患者。