Dukhin Andrei S, Goetz Philip J
Dispersion Technology Inc., Bedford Hills, New York 10507, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2009 Mar 28;130(12):124519. doi: 10.1063/1.3095471.
Bulk viscosity is a somewhat obscure parameter that appears in the hydrodynamic equations for Newtonian liquids when compressibility is important and, together with the dynamic viscosity, controls sound attenuation. Whereas dynamic viscosity reflects only "translational" molecular motion, in contrast the bulk viscosity reflects the relaxation of both "rotational" and "vibrational" degrees of molecular freedom. Several molecular theories yield predictive expressions for both bulk and dynamic viscosities, but experimentally the situation is quite out of balance, in that there is extensive data for the dynamic viscosity of all sorts of liquids, but a paucity of data for bulk viscosity, just a few values for water and a handful of exotic liquids. We compare three possible experimental techniques for measuring bulk viscosity, namely, Brillouin spectroscopy, Laser transient grating spectroscopy, and acoustic spectroscopy. We then formulate some arguments suggesting that acoustic spectroscopy is not only the most suitable for measuring bulk viscosity, but that it also offers a verification procedure that can confirm that the measured parameter agrees with theoretical definition of bulk viscosity for a Newtonian liquid. In addition, acoustic spectroscopy provides a measurement of sound speed, which cannot only improve the attenuation measurement but as a side benefit can also be used to calculate liquid compressibility. We apply this technique for measuring the bulk viscosity and compressibility of twelve commonly assumed Newtonian liquids, two of which surprisingly fails to pass a verification test described here to test the Newtonian hypothesis. Then, we test correlation between measured bulk viscosity and several other intensive properties of these liquids, such as density, dynamic viscosity, dielectric permittivity, and compressibility. We have not discovered any meaningful correlation. This suggests that bulk viscosity is an independent parameter that reflects peculiar properties of liquids and can be used in the set of independent equations describing molecular interaction in liquids.
体黏滞系数是一个有些晦涩的参数,当可压缩性很重要时,它会出现在牛顿流体的流体动力学方程中,并且与动力黏滞系数一起控制声音衰减。动力黏滞系数仅反映分子的“平动”运动,相比之下,体黏滞系数反映分子自由度的“转动”和“振动”弛豫。几种分子理论给出了体黏滞系数和动力黏滞系数的预测表达式,但在实验方面,情况却很不均衡,因为有大量关于各种液体动力黏滞系数的数据,而体黏滞系数的数据却很少,只有水和少数几种特殊液体的几个值。我们比较了三种测量体黏滞系数的可能实验技术,即布里渊光谱法、激光瞬态光栅光谱法和声光谱法。然后,我们提出一些观点,表明声光谱法不仅最适合测量体黏滞系数,而且还提供了一种验证程序,可以确认测量的参数与牛顿流体体黏滞系数的理论定义相符。此外,声光谱法还能测量声速,这不仅可以改进衰减测量,而且作为附带好处,还可用于计算液体的可压缩性。我们应用这种技术测量了十二种通常被认为是牛顿流体的液体的体黏滞系数和可压缩性,其中有两种液体令人惊讶地未能通过此处描述的验证测试,该测试用于检验牛顿假设。然后,我们测试了测量的体黏滞系数与这些液体的其他几个强度性质之间的相关性,如密度、动力黏滞系数、介电常数和可压缩性。我们没有发现任何有意义的相关性。这表明体黏滞系数是一个独立参数,反映了液体的特殊性质,可用于描述液体中分子相互作用的独立方程组中。