• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较临床应用中的缝合强度:一项新的体外研究。

Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study.

作者信息

Vasanthan Asvin, Satheesh Keerthana, Hoopes Wyeth, Lucaci Patrick, Williams Karen, Rapley John

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):618-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080490.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2009.080490
PMID:19335082
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strengths of commonly used sutures over a 2-week period under simulated oral conditions.

METHODS

Three suture materials (chromic gut [CG], polyglactin [PG], and polyglactin-fast absorbing [PG-FA]) were used in 4-0 and 5-0 gauges. After pretensioning, 252 suture samples (42 of each material and gauge) were used. A biologic simulation was created in vitro by mixing 9 ml sterile human saliva and human serum in a 1:1 ratio in a petri dish maintained at a pH of 7.4 to 8.1 at 37 degrees C. All samples were tested preimmersion and 1 hour and 1, 3, 7, 10, and 14 days postimmersion. The tensile strength was assessed using a microtensile tester, and the maximum load required to cause suture breakage was determined. The point of breakage in the samples and the samples themselves were also assessed.

RESULTS

During the first 24 hours of immersion, all 4-0 and 5-0 samples of CG and PG maintained their initial level of tensile strength; PG-FA 5-0 decreased in strength, which was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Between days 1 and 3, the tensile strength of PG and PG-FA decreased significantly, with PG-FA 5-0 showing a greater and more precipitous decrease than PG-FA 4-0; the tensile strength of CG changed little during this time. After 7 days of immersion, PG 4-0 had significantly greater tensile strength than CG, and both were significantly greater than that of PG-FA. By day 10, CG and PG had statistically greater strength (P = 0.01) than PG-FA, and values were similar for the 4-0 and 5-0 gauge materials. All samples of PG-FA 5-0 and most samples of the PG-FA 4-0 exhibited 0.00 N strength (i.e., they had disintegrated) at the 10- and 14-day periods of evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

4-0 sutures are stronger and have greater tensile strength than 5-0 sutures. CG seems to sustain its strength better than PG and PG-FA after 2 weeks. PG-FA may not be a desirable suture if tensile strength is required after 10 days. Appropriately designed clinical studies are necessary to confirm this finding in an in vivo environment.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是在模拟口腔条件下比较常用缝线在2周时间内的抗张强度。

方法

使用三种缝线材料(铬制肠线[CG]、聚乙醇酸[PG]和快速吸收聚乙醇酸[PG-FA]),规格为4-0和5-0。预张紧后,使用252个缝线样本(每种材料和规格各42个)。通过在37摄氏度下将9毫升无菌人唾液和人血清按1:1比例混合在培养皿中,使其pH值保持在7.4至8.1,在体外创建生物模拟环境。所有样本在浸泡前、浸泡后1小时以及浸泡后1、3、7、10和14天进行测试。使用微拉伸测试仪评估抗张强度,并确定导致缝线断裂所需的最大负荷。还对样本中的断裂点和样本本身进行了评估。

结果

在浸泡的前24小时内,CG和PG的所有4-0和5-0样本均保持其初始抗张强度水平;PG-FA 5-0的强度下降,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。在第1天至第3天之间,PG和PG-FA的抗张强度显著下降,PG-FA 5-0的下降幅度比PG-FA 4-0更大且更急剧;在此期间,CG的抗张强度变化不大。浸泡7天后,PG 4-0的抗张强度显著高于CG,且两者均显著高于PG-FA。到第10天,CG和PG的强度在统计学上高于PG-FA(P = 0.01),4-0和5-0规格材料的值相似。在评估的第10天和第14天,PG-FA 5-0的所有样本以及PG-FA 4-0的大多数样本均表现出0.00 N的强度(即它们已经分解)。

结论

4-0缝线比5-0缝线更强且具有更大的抗张强度。2周后,CG似乎比PG和PG-FA更好地保持其强度。如果在10天后需要抗张强度,PG-FA可能不是理想的缝线。需要进行适当设计的临床研究以在体内环境中证实这一发现。

相似文献

1
Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study.比较临床应用中的缝合强度:一项新的体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):618-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080490.
2
Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical synthetic absorbable suture materials: an in vitro study.外科合成可吸收缝线材料拉伸强度的评估:一项体外研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013 Jun;43(3):130-5. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.3.130. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
3
Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures.盐溶液条件对眼科缝线抗张强度的影响。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;42(2):148-51. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20101124-01. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
4
Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.可吸收缝线材料的拉伸强度:pH 值和细菌影响的体外分析。
J Surg Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;66(4):208-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.007.
5
Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.人胰液和胆汁对缝合材料抗张强度的影响。
Am J Surg. 2004 Aug;188(2):200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.068.
6
Impact of Fluoridated Mouthwashes on Strength and Durability of Three Different Synthetic Absorbable Suturing Materials: An Study.含氟漱口水对三种不同合成可吸收缝合材料强度和耐久性的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):431-436.
7
Comparison between tensile characteristics of various suture materials with two suture techniques: an in vitro study.不同缝线材料与两种缝线技术的拉伸特性比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6393-6401. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03943-3. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
8
The effect of a hydrogen peroxide wound care regimen on tensile strength of suture.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;9(4):281-4. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.9.4.281.
9
Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.尿液对尿道下裂手术缝线抗张强度的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jun;66(6):835-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
10
Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.在张力下,单丝和多丝缝线的扭转会降低缝线强度,并增加缝线断裂的风险。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug;12:168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A basic study on the mechanical properties of synthetic absorbable sutures under various pH conditions in vitro.体外不同pH条件下合成可吸收缝线力学性能的基础研究。
J Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jun 1;87(6):667-674. doi: 10.1292/jvms.25-0028. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Effect of suturing in root coverage via coronally advanced flaps: A systematic review.通过冠向推进瓣进行缝合在牙根覆盖中的作用:一项系统评价。
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2025 Jun;15(2):179-190. doi: 10.1002/cap.10312. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Investigation of Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Multifilament Suture Materials in Terms of Strength Changes Using Chlorhexidine Mouthwash and Thermal Cycling: An In Vitro Study.
使用洗必泰漱口水和热循环对可吸收和不可吸收多股缝线材料强度变化的研究:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 4;17(15):3862. doi: 10.3390/ma17153862.
4
Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Surgically Absorbable Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery after Immersion in Different Beverages: An In Vitro Study.口腔外科手术中使用的可吸收缝合材料浸泡在不同饮料后拉伸强度的评估:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 20;17(14):3586. doi: 10.3390/ma17143586.
5
Study of Tensile Strength Comparison of Selected Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture Materials after Immersion in 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate.0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定浸泡后选定的不可吸收和可吸收缝合材料拉伸强度比较的研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Jun 27;14(3):201-210. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_162_23. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
6
Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials after immersion in different fruit juices: An study.不同果汁浸泡后手术可吸收和不可吸收缝合材料拉伸强度的评估:一项研究。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S108-S111. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_267_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
7
Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.欧洲疝学会和美国疝学会更新的腹壁切口缝合指南。
Br J Surg. 2022 Nov 22;109(12):1239-1250. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac302.
8
Effect of Common Mouthwashes on Mechanical Properties of Suture Materials Used in Dental Surgeries: A Laboratory Experiment.常用漱口水对牙科手术中使用的缝合材料力学性能的影响:一项实验室实验。
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;14(12):2439. doi: 10.3390/polym14122439.
9
Characteristics of Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery: Systematic Review.口腔外科缝线材料的特点:系统评价。
Int Dent J. 2022 Jun;72(3):278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Evaluation of Breaking Force of Different Suture Materials Used in Dentistry: An In Vitro Mechanical Comparison.牙科用不同缝合材料的断裂力评估:体外力学比较
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 30;15(3):1082. doi: 10.3390/ma15031082.