Suppr超能文献

一种基于社区参与的个性化计算机生成营养反馈报告方法:健康环境伙伴关系。

A community-based participatory approach to personalized, computer-generated nutrition feedback reports: the healthy environments partnership.

作者信息

Kannan Srimathi, Schulz Amy, Israel Barbara, Ayra Indira, Weir Sheryl, Dvonch Timothy J, Rowe Zachary, Miller Patricia, Benjamin Alison

机构信息

University of Massachusetts, Department of Nutrition, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Spring;2(1):41-53. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2008.0004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer tailoring and personalizing recommendations for dietary health-promoting behaviors are in accordance with community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles, which emphasizes research that benefits the participants and community involved.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the CBPR process utilized to computer-generate and disseminate personalized nutrition feedback reports (NFRs) for Detroit Healthy Environments Partnership (HEP) study participants.

METHODS

The CBPR process included discussion and feedback from HEP partners on several draft personalized reports. The nutrition feedback process included defining the feedback objectives; prioritizing the nutrients; customizing the report design; reviewing and revising the NFR template and readability; producing and disseminating the report; and participant follow-up.

LESSONS LEARNED

Application of CBPR principles in designing the NFR resulted in a reader-friendly product with useful recommendations to promote heart health.

CONCLUSIONS

A CBPR process can enhance computer tailoring of personalized NFRs to address racial and socioeconomic disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD).

摘要

背景

针对促进饮食健康行为的计算机定制和个性化推荐符合基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)原则,该原则强调开展使相关参与者和社区受益的研究。

目的

描述为底特律健康环境伙伴关系(HEP)研究参与者计算机生成并传播个性化营养反馈报告(NFR)所采用的CBPR过程。

方法

CBPR过程包括HEP合作伙伴对几份个性化报告草稿的讨论和反馈。营养反馈过程包括确定反馈目标;对营养素进行优先级排序;定制报告设计;审查和修订NFR模板及可读性;生成并传播报告;以及对参与者进行随访。

经验教训

在设计NFR时应用CBPR原则产生了一份对读者友好的产品,并提供了促进心脏健康的实用建议。

结论

CBPR过程可加强个性化NFR的计算机定制,以解决心血管疾病(CVD)方面的种族和社会经济差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Systematic Review of Community-Engaged Research in Ophthalmology.眼科社区参与研究的系统评价
Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2017;12(3):233-241. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2017.1311787. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验