Strong Larkin L, Israel Barbara A, Schulz Amy J, Reyes Angela, Rowe Zachary, Weir Sheryl S, Poe Cecil
Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Winter;3(4):327-34. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0094.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships experience unique opportunities and dilemmas when implementing pilot interventions.
We describe challenges and opportunities associated with conducting a pilot intervention within a longstanding CBPR partnership, lessons learned for use of a participatory process to pilot community interventions, and recommendations to funders on mechanisms for funding pilot interventions to help address these challenges.
We conducted key informant interviews and convened a group discussion with host organization leaders and project personnel.
Findings highlight the opportunities and challenges related to needs and desires of community constituents and the ability of pilot interventions to meet those needs, and the importance of ongoing communication to address anticipated and unanticipated challenges that arise in the context of short-term pilot interventions in community settings.
We suggest several funding mechanisms for supporting the implementation of larger scale interventions following promising pilot efforts in community settings.
基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)伙伴关系在实施试点干预措施时会遇到独特的机遇和困境。
我们描述了在长期的CBPR伙伴关系中进行试点干预所面临的挑战和机遇,从使用参与性过程来试点社区干预措施中吸取的经验教训,以及向资助者提出的关于为试点干预措施提供资金的机制的建议,以帮助应对这些挑战。
我们进行了关键信息访谈,并与主办组织的领导人和项目人员召开了小组讨论。
研究结果突出了与社区选民的需求和愿望以及试点干预措施满足这些需求的能力相关的机遇和挑战,以及持续沟通对于应对在社区环境中短期试点干预背景下出现的预期和意外挑战的重要性。
我们建议了几种资助机制,以支持在社区环境中进行有前景的试点努力后实施更大规模的干预措施。