• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Concerns about end-of-life care and support for euthanasia.对临终关怀和安乐死支持的担忧。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Aug;38(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.012. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Decisions at the end of life: Catholic tradition.临终决策:天主教传统
Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):188-203. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.188.
4
Public attitudes toward the right to die.公众对死亡权利的态度。
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):701-8.
5
Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.荷兰普通公众对善终的偏好以及与临终决策态度的关联。
Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;20(7):685-92. doi: 10.1177/0269216306070241.
6
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
7
Provision of spiritual support to patients with advanced cancer by religious communities and associations with medical care at the end of life.为晚期癌症患者提供精神支持:宗教团体与临终关怀医疗服务的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1109-17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.903.
8
Treatment decision-making at the end of life: a survey of Australian doctors' attitudes towards patients' wishes and euthanasia.临终时的治疗决策:澳大利亚医生对患者意愿和安乐死态度的调查。
Med J Aust. 1996 Nov 18;165(10):540-4.
9
End-of-life issues in intensive care units: a national random survey of nurses' knowledge and beliefs.重症监护病房中的临终问题:一项关于护士知识与信念的全国随机调查。
Am J Crit Care. 2001 Jul;10(4):216-29.
10
Refractory pain, existential suffering, and palliative care: releasing an unbearable lightness of being.难治性疼痛、生存性痛苦与姑息治疗:释放难以承受的生命之轻
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2011 Spring;20(3):469-532.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional survey on public attitudes and factors related to physician-assisted dying in Taiwan.台湾地区公众对医师协助自杀的态度及相关因素的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e089388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089388.
2
Strength of Religious Faith and Attitude Towards Euthanasia Among Medical Professionals and Opinion Makers.宗教信仰的力量与医疗专业人员和舆论领袖对安乐死的态度。
J Relig Health. 2024 Apr;63(2):1075-1090. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01860-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Associations of end-of-life preferences and trust in institutions with public support for assisted suicide: evidence from nationally representative survey data of older adults in Switzerland.与临终偏好和对机构的信任相关联的公众对协助自杀的支持:来自瑞士全国代表性老年人群体调查数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0232109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232109. eCollection 2020.
4
Pain acceptance in cancer patients with chronic pain in Hunan, China: A qualitative study.中国湖南慢性疼痛癌症患者的疼痛接纳情况:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Sep 23;6(4):385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.09.011. eCollection 2019 Oct 10.
5
Factors associated with preferences for long-term care settings in old age: evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.老年长期护理机构偏好的相关因素:来自德国一项基于人群调查的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2101-y.
6
New frontiers in the future of palliative care: real-world bioethical dilemmas and axiology of clinical practice.姑息治疗未来的新前沿:现实世界中的生物伦理困境与临床实践的价值论
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Feb 26;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0003-2.
7
'Burden to others' as a public concern in advanced cancer: a comparative survey in seven European countries.晚期癌症患者对他人造成的负担:七个欧洲国家的对比调查。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Mar 8;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-105.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Oregon patients request assisted death: family members' views.俄勒冈州患者请求协助死亡的原因:家庭成员的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):154-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0476-x. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
2
Explaining the emergence of euthanasia law in the Netherlands: how the sociology of law can help the sociology of bioethics.解释荷兰安乐死法的出现:法律社会学如何助力生命伦理学社会学。
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Sep;28(6):802-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00543.x.
3
Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.荷兰普通公众对善终的偏好以及与临终决策态度的关联。
Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;20(7):685-92. doi: 10.1177/0269216306070241.
4
Trends in public approval of euthanasia and suicide in the US, 1947-2003.1947 - 2003年美国公众对安乐死和自杀的认可趋势。
J Med Ethics. 2006 May;32(5):266-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011072.
5
Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981-1999).12个欧洲国家(1981 - 1999年)公众对安乐死的接受趋势。
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Dec;16(6):663-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl042. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
6
European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(3):743-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.026. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
7
Euthanasia: moral paradoxes.
Palliat Med. 2001 Nov;15(6):505-11. doi: 10.1191/026921601682554003.
8
Public attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide for terminally ill persons: 1977 and 1996.公众对绝症患者安乐死和自杀的态度:1977年与1996年。
Soc Biol. 2000 Fall-Winter;47(3-4):264-76. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2000.9989022.
9
Instability of attitudes about euthanasia and physician assisted suicide in depressed older hospitalized patients.老年住院抑郁症患者对安乐死和医生协助自杀态度的不稳定性。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;23(6):326-32. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00160-8.
10
Life-sustaining treatment and assisted death choices in depressed older patients.老年抑郁症患者的维持生命治疗与辅助死亡选择
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Feb;49(2):153-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49036.x.

对临终关怀和安乐死支持的担忧。

Concerns about end-of-life care and support for euthanasia.

作者信息

Givens Jane L, Mitchell Susan L

机构信息

Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Aug;38(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.012. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.012
PMID:19345554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2782598/
Abstract

Popular support for euthanasia is known to vary according to sociodemographic characteristics. However, little is known about whether support is associated with concerns regarding the emotional, physical, and economic burdens of end-of-life care. This study used data from the 1998 General Social Survey, a national survey of community-dwelling adults. The outcome variable assessed the respondents' support for a doctor's right to end life in the setting of terminal illness. Independent variables assessed the following concerns: 1) concern about the emotional burden of end-of-life decision making for family members; 2) worry about the economic burden of terminal illness; 3) concern about pain at the end of life; 4) worry that lack of money or insurance will result in second-class end-of-life care; and 5) belief that their religious community will be helpful at the end of life. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the independent effect of these concerns on support for euthanasia, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Of 786 respondents, 70.6% approved of euthanasia in the setting of terminal illness. In adjusted analyses, respondents with concerns about the emotional toll of decision making on family members, economic burden, and poor health care because of lack of insurance were significantly more likely to support euthanasia. Respondents with faith in the helpfulness of their religious community were less likely to support euthanasia. In conclusion, emotional and economic concerns about end-of-life care were associated with support for the right to euthanasia. Future work can evaluate whether alleviating these concerns may reduce the perceived desire for euthanasia by patients near the end of life.

摘要

众所周知,公众对安乐死的支持因社会人口特征而异。然而,对于这种支持是否与对临终关怀的情感、身体和经济负担的担忧相关,却知之甚少。本研究使用了1998年综合社会调查的数据,这是一项针对社区居住成年人的全国性调查。结果变量评估了受访者对医生在绝症情况下结束生命权利的支持程度。自变量评估了以下担忧:1)对家庭成员临终决策情感负担的担忧;2)对绝症经济负担的担忧;3)对生命末期疼痛的担忧;4)担心缺乏资金或保险会导致临终关怀质量低下;5)相信他们的宗教团体在临终时会有所帮助。多变量逻辑回归估计了这些担忧对安乐死支持度的独立影响,并对社会人口特征进行了调整。在786名受访者中,70.6%的人赞成在绝症情况下实施安乐死。在调整后的分析中,对家庭成员决策情感负担、经济负担以及因缺乏保险而导致医疗保健不佳表示担忧的受访者,支持安乐死的可能性显著更高。对其宗教团体的帮助抱有信心的受访者支持安乐死的可能性较小。总之,对临终关怀的情感和经济担忧与对安乐死权利的支持相关。未来的研究可以评估减轻这些担忧是否可能降低临终患者对安乐死的预期需求。