实用主义者的回应。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The practicalists' response.

作者信息

Karanicolas Paul J, Montori Victor M, Devereaux P J, Schünemann Holger, Guyatt Gordon H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013

PMID:19348974

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The practicalists' response.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013.

A pragmatic resolution.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):495-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.014.

Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015.

Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policymakers.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.021.

A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 12.

Designing studies of computer-based alerts and reminders.

MD Comput. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):122-6.

What kind of randomized trials do we need?

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):461-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.011.

Randomized concentration-controlled trials: motivations, use, and limitations.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Sep;74(3):203-14. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00169-3.

Eroding precision in scientific communications: contagion from "the real world".

Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):182. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.008.

Randomized trials and recruitment tribulations: rethinking the research enterprise.

J Pediatr. 2002 Dec;141(6):756-7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.130359.

引用本文的文献

CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research.

Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.025.

Differences between the real and the desired worlds in the results of clinical trials.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):618-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)04.

Are explanatory trials ethical? Shifting the burden of justification in clinical trial design.

Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Aug;34(4):293-308. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9262-4.

The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized trial design: experiences from an investigative team.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability.

Trials. 2009 Jun 3;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-37.

What kind of randomized trials do we need?

CMAJ. 2009 May 12;180(10):998-1000. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.082007. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

The practicalists' response.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013.

A pragmatic resolution.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):495-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.014.

Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015.

Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policymakers.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.021.

A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 12.

Designing studies of computer-based alerts and reminders.

MD Comput. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):122-6.

What kind of randomized trials do we need?

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):461-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.011.

Randomized concentration-controlled trials: motivations, use, and limitations.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Sep;74(3):203-14. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00169-3.

Eroding precision in scientific communications: contagion from "the real world".

Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):182. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.008.

Randomized trials and recruitment tribulations: rethinking the research enterprise.

J Pediatr. 2002 Dec;141(6):756-7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.130359.

引用本文的文献

CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research.

Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.025.

Differences between the real and the desired worlds in the results of clinical trials.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):618-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)04.

Are explanatory trials ethical? Shifting the burden of justification in clinical trial design.

Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Aug;34(4):293-308. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9262-4.

The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized trial design: experiences from an investigative team.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability.

Trials. 2009 Jun 3;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-37.

What kind of randomized trials do we need?

CMAJ. 2009 May 12;180(10):998-1000. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.082007. Epub 2009 Apr 16.