What kind of randomized trials do we need?
作者信息
Zwarenstein Merrick, Treweek Shaun
机构信息
Centre for Health Services Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Rm. G1-06, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2009 May 12;180(10):998-1000. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.082007. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What kind of randomized trials do we need?
CMAJ. 2009 May 12;180(10):998-1000. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.082007. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
2
Overhauling clinical trials.
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;25(3):287-92. doi: 10.1038/nbt0307-287.
3
Expedited approval programs at the Food and Drug Administration.
Clin Trials. 2018 Jun;15(3):217-218. doi: 10.1177/1740774518770653.
4
Challenges and opportunities for conducting neonatal clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries.
J Perinatol. 2019 Sep;39(Suppl 1):1-2. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0470-2.
5
Controversy trails adaptive clinical trials.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19;104(18):1347-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs404. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
6
FDA and pharma seek better ways to assess drug safety, efficacy in clinical trials.
JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2576-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.6684.
7
The continuing unethical use of placebo controls.
N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):394-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310611.
8
Mechanical Cardiac Support 2000: Current applications and future trial design.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Mar;121(3):418-24. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.113857.
9
Issues of study design and data analysis.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1998 May;4(2):109-111; discussion 111-3. doi: 10.1097/00054725-199805000-00012.
10
Research for practitioners or research for researchers?
J Am Coll Dent. 1998 Fall;65(3):2-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Implementation fidelity in a multifaceted program to foster rational antibiotics use in primary care: an observational study.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01725-3.
2
Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Teriflunomide versus Dimethyl Fumarate for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Neurol Res Int. 2021 Jul 15;2021:6679197. doi: 10.1155/2021/6679197. eCollection 2021.
3
Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Resilience-Focussed Interventions: A Conceptual Analysis to Inform Future Research.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147315.
4
A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
5
Treatment effects in randomised trials using routinely collected data for outcome assessment versus traditional trials: meta-research study.
BMJ. 2021 Mar 3;372:n450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n450.
6
Effectiveness of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Dornase Alfa vs Tissue Plasminogen Activator Alone in Children with Pleural Empyema: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):332-340. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5863.
7
The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
Trials. 2019 Dec 23;20(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3899-x.
8
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology. 2019 Aug 13;93(7):e635-e646. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007938. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Research-grade data in the real world: challenges and opportunities in data quality from a pragmatic trial in community-based practices.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):847-854. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz062.
10
Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol.
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Nov 20;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0332-z.
本文引用的文献
1
A pragmatic resolution.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):495-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.014.
2
The practicalists' response.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013.
3
Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015.
4
Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policymakers.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.021.
5
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):464-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.011.
6
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
BMJ. 2008 Nov 11;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390.
7
STREPTOMYCIN treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Br Med J. 1948 Oct 30;2(4582):769-82.
8
A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 12.
9
[A critical review of the pragmatic clinical trial].
Med Clin (Barc). 2003 Sep 27;121(10):384-8. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(03)73957-8.
10
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.
JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
Zotero 插件