• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution.

作者信息

Oxman Andrew D, Lombard Carl, Treweek Shaun, Gagnier Joel J, Maclure Malcolm, Zwarenstein Merrick

机构信息

Preventive and International Health Care Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015
PMID:19348973
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution.为何我们仍将是实用主义者：不切实际的机械论框架存在的四个问题及更好的解决办法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.015.
2
A pragmatic resolution.一个务实的解决方案。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):495-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.014.
3
The practicalists' response.实用主义者的回应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.013.
4
A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials.一种用于设计和解释随机试验的新“机制-实践”框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 May 12.
5
Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policymakers.向注重实效的政策制定者解释实用性试验
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.021.
6
What kind of randomized trials do we need?我们需要什么样的随机试验？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):461-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.011.
7
Eroding precision in scientific communications: contagion from "the real world".科学传播中精度的侵蚀：来自“现实世界”的影响。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):182. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.008.
8
Randomized concentration-controlled trials: motivations, use, and limitations.随机浓度对照试验：动机、用途及局限性
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Sep;74(3):203-14. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00169-3.
9
[Why and how randomise a clinical trial?].
Rev Mal Respir. 2003 Nov;20(5 Pt 1):753-6.
10
Randomized trials and recruitment tribulations: rethinking the research enterprise.随机试验与招募难题：对研究事业的反思
J Pediatr. 2002 Dec;141(6):756-7. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.130359.

引用本文的文献

1
How to design high quality acupuncture trials-a consensus informed by evidence.如何设计高质量的针灸临床试验——基于证据的共识。
BMJ. 2022 Mar 30;376:e067476. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067476.
2
Integrating Measurement-Based Care into Treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Insights from a Community Clinic.将基于测量的护理融入自闭症谱系障碍的治疗中：社区诊所的见解。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Oct;51(10):3651-3661. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04824-6. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Intensive Motion Style Acupuncture Treatment (MSAT) Is Effective for Patients with Acute Whiplash Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
强化运动式针刺疗法（MSAT）对急性挥鞭样损伤患者有效：一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):2079. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072079.
4
CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research.绘制实用烟草治疗研究之路
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.025.
5
Differences between the real and the desired worlds in the results of clinical trials.临床试验结果中现实世界与期望世界的差异。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):618-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)04.
6
A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse.试点和可行性试验后的决策流程（ADePT）：针对盆腔器官脱垂的复杂干预措施进行可行性研究后开展的开发工作
Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353.
7
Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs).形式遵循功能：实用性对照试验（PCTs）必须回答与随机对照试验（RCTs）不同的问题，并且需要不同的设计。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2013 Jun;21(3):307-313. doi: 10.1007/s10389-012-0544-5. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions.干预描述不够：来自七个复杂干预措施随机对照试验中未说明的背景作用和影响的深入多案例研究的证据。
Trials. 2012 Jun 28;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-95.
9
The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized trial design: experiences from an investigative team.实用-解释连续体指标摘要（PRECIS）工具可用于改进随机试验设计：来自研究小组的经验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
10
Interprofessional collaborative practice within cancer teams: Translating evidence into action. A mixed methods study protocol.癌症团队内的跨专业协作实践：将证据转化为行动。一项混合方法研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jul 13;5:53. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-53.