Chanthong Pratamaporn, Abrishami Amir, Wong Jean, Herrera Francisco, Chung Frances
Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1061-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819db079.
Patient satisfaction has become an important component of quality improvement in ambulatory anesthesia services. However, it is difficult to measure due to its subjective and complex psychological construct. Psychometric methodology has been successfully used to evaluate this outcome. The authors conducted a systematic review to evaluate questionnaires to measure patient satisfaction with ambulatory anesthesia.
A systematic literature search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HAPI, PsycINFO, and Dissertation Abstracts was performed to identify studies on questionnaires evaluating patient satisfaction after ambulatory anesthesia. The authors included the articles that used multiple-item questionnaires, and the questionnaires were assessed with the strategy of psychometric questionnaire construction, validity, reliability, and acceptability.
The authors scanned 131 articles yielded by our search strategy. Eleven articles were included in the study. Two questionnaires, IOWA Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale and Evaluation du Vecu de I'Anesthesie Generale, fulfilled the criteria, but the latter was not developed specifically for ambulatory anesthesia, whereas Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale was designed only for monitored anesthesia patients.
In a large number of trials, patient satisfaction has been evaluated using overall satisfaction or nonvalidated questionnaires. Only a few studies have developed questionnaires with rigorous psychometric methods to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia care. At this time, there is still no valid or reliable questionnaire for measuring patient satisfaction in ambulatory anesthesia. Further study should be conducted to develop standardized instruments to measure this outcome.
患者满意度已成为门诊麻醉服务质量改进的重要组成部分。然而,由于其主观且复杂的心理构成,难以进行测量。心理测量方法已成功用于评估这一结果。作者进行了一项系统评价,以评估用于测量患者对门诊麻醉满意度的问卷。
对Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、HAPI、PsycINFO和学位论文摘要进行系统文献检索,以识别关于评估门诊麻醉后患者满意度问卷的研究。作者纳入了使用多项目问卷的文章,并采用心理测量问卷构建、效度、信度和可接受性策略对问卷进行评估。
作者筛选了我们检索策略产生的131篇文章。11篇文章纳入研究。两份问卷,即爱荷华麻醉满意度量表和全麻体验评估量表,符合标准,但后者并非专门为门诊麻醉开发,而爱荷华麻醉满意度量表仅针对监测麻醉患者设计。
在大量试验中,患者满意度是使用总体满意度或未经验证的问卷进行评估的。只有少数研究采用严格的心理测量方法开发问卷来测量患者对麻醉护理的满意度。目前,仍没有有效或可靠的问卷来测量门诊麻醉患者的满意度。应进一步开展研究以开发标准化工具来测量这一结果。