Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba;
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008 Mar;19(2):185-92. doi: 10.1155/2008/538975.
The presence of the highly pathogenic avian H5N1 virus in wild bird populations in several regions of the world, together with recurrent cases of H5N1 influenza arising primarily from direct contact with poultry, have highlighted the urgent need for prepared-ness and coordinated global strategies to effectively combat a potential influenza pandemic. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Canadian pandemic influenza preparedness plan.
A mathematical model of the transmission dynamics of influenza was used to keep track of the population according to risk of infection (low or high) and infection status (susceptible, exposed or infectious). The model was parametrized using available Canadian demographic data. The model was then used to evaluate the key components outlined in the Canadian plan.
The results indicated that the number of cases, mortalities and hospitalizations estimated in the Canadian plan may have been underestimated; the use of antivirals, administered therapeutically, prophylactically or both, is the most effective single intervention followed by the use of a vaccine and basic public health measures; and the combined use of pharmaceutical interventions (antivirals and vaccine) can dramatically minimize the burden of the pending influenza pandemic in Canada. Based on increasing concerns of Oseltamivir resistance (wide-scale implementation), coupled with the expected unavailability of a suitable vaccine during the early stages of a pandemic, the present study evaluated the potential impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) which were not emphasized in the current Canadian plan. To this end, the findings suggest that the use of NPIs can drastically reduce the burden of a pandemic in Canada.
A deterministic model was designed and used to assess Canada's pandemic preparedness plan. The study showed that the estimates of pandemic influenza burden given in the Canada pandemic preparedness plan may be an underestimate, and that Canada needs to adopt NPIs to complement its preparedness plan.
高致病性禽流感 H5N1 病毒在世界多个地区的野生鸟类种群中的存在,以及主要通过与家禽直接接触而发生的反复 H5N1 流感病例,突显了迫切需要做好准备和采取协调一致的全球战略,以有效应对潜在的流感大流行。本研究旨在评估加拿大的大流行性流感防备计划。
使用流感传播动力学的数学模型来根据感染风险(低或高)和感染状况(易感、暴露或感染)对人群进行跟踪。该模型使用可用的加拿大人口统计数据进行参数化。然后,使用该模型评估加拿大计划中概述的关键组成部分。
结果表明,加拿大计划中估计的病例、死亡人数和住院人数可能被低估;使用抗病毒药物,无论是治疗性、预防性还是两者兼用,都是最有效的单一干预措施,其次是使用疫苗和基本公共卫生措施;联合使用药物干预(抗病毒药物和疫苗)可以大大减少加拿大即将发生的流感大流行的负担。基于对奥司他韦耐药性的日益关注(广泛实施),再加上大流行早期预计无法获得合适的疫苗,本研究评估了加拿大当前计划中未强调的非药物干预措施(NPIs)的潜在影响。为此,研究结果表明,NPIs 的使用可以大大减轻加拿大大流行的负担。
设计并使用了一个确定性模型来评估加拿大的大流行性流感防备计划。该研究表明,加拿大大流行性流感防备计划中给出的大流行性流感负担估计数可能偏低,加拿大需要采取 NPIs 来补充其防备计划。