Martin Robroy L, Hutt Dennis M, Wukich Dane K
Duquesne University, Physical Therapy, 600 Forbes Avenue, 111A RSHS, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):297-302. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0297.
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) has been shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive in a general orthopaedic population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity for the FAAM in individuals with diabetes. It was hypothesized that FAAM scores would relate to measures of physical function while not correspond to measures of mental health. It was also hypothesized that FAAM scores would be different based on reported general health.
Eighty-three subjects with diabetes and foot and ankle related complaints completed intake information during a routine clinical visit. Subjects had an average age of 60.3 (range, 21 to 93; SD 13.7) years. Subjects were grouped based on their reported general health with 55 (64.7%) and 28 (32.9%), reporting excellent-good and fair-poor general health, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the FAAM and SF-36. As evidence for discriminative validity, one-way ANOVA was used to determine if FAAM scores could distinguish between individuals that reported excellent-good from those that reported fair-poor levels of general health.
The FAAM had high correlation to the SF-36 physical function subscale (r > 0.60) and physical component summary score (r > 0.70) and significantly (p < 0.005) lower correlation to the mental health subscale (r < 0.33) and mental component summary score (r < 0.30). One-way ANOVA found those that reported excellent-good general health scored significantly higher on the ADL subscale (57 vs 44 [F(1,82) = 4.6, p = 0.035]) but did score differently on the Sports subscales (32 vs 22 [F(1,70)=1.7, p = 0.20]).
This study offers evidence of validity for the FAAM ADL subscale as an outcome instrument to measure physical function in individuals with diabetes and foot and/or ankle related disorders. Further research is needed for the Sports subscale in individuals with diabetes who are functioning at a higher level.
足踝功能测量量表(FAAM)已被证明在一般骨科人群中具有可靠性、有效性和反应性。本研究的目的是评估FAAM在糖尿病患者中的有效性。研究假设FAAM评分与身体功能测量指标相关,而与心理健康测量指标无关。还假设FAAM评分会因报告的总体健康状况不同而有所差异。
83名患有糖尿病且有足踝相关主诉的受试者在常规临床就诊时完成了摄入信息。受试者的平均年龄为60.3岁(范围21至93岁;标准差13.7)。根据报告的总体健康状况对受试者进行分组,分别有55名(64.7%)和28名(32.9%)报告总体健康状况为优-良和中-差。使用Pearson相关系数评估FAAM与SF-36之间的关系。作为区分效度的证据,采用单因素方差分析来确定FAAM评分是否能够区分报告总体健康状况为优-良的个体与报告总体健康状况为中-差的个体。
FAAM与SF-36身体功能子量表(r>0.60)和身体成分汇总评分(r>0.70)高度相关,而与心理健康子量表(r<0.33)和心理成分汇总评分(r<0.30)的相关性显著较低(p<0.005)。单因素方差分析发现,报告总体健康状况为优-良的个体在ADL子量表上的得分显著更高(57对44 [F(1,82)=4.6,p=0.035]),但在运动子量表上得分无差异(32对22 [F(1,70)=1.7,p=0.20])。
本研究为FAAM ADL子量表作为测量糖尿病及足踝相关疾病患者身体功能的结局指标提供了有效性证据。对于功能水平较高的糖尿病患者的运动子量表,还需要进一步研究。