Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1495, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jun;47(6):451-3. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
A number of effective treatments for bulimia nervosa have been developed, but they are infrequently used, in part due to problems with dissemination. The goal of this study was to examine the cost effectiveness of telemedicine delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa.
A randomized controlled trial of face-to-face versus telemedicine cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa. One hundred twenty eight women with DSM-IV bulimia nervosa or eating disorder, not otherwise specified subsyndromal variants of bulimia nervosa were randomized to 20 sessions of treatment over 16 weeks. A cost effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was conducted.
The total cost per recovered (abstinent) subject was $9324.68 for face-to-face CBT, and $7300.40 for telemedicine CBT. The cost differential was accounted for largely by therapist travel costs. Sensitivity analyses examining therapy session costs, gasoline costs and telemedicine connection costs yielded fundamentally similar results.
In this study, CBT delivered face-to-face and via telemedicine were similarly effective, and telemedicine delivery cost substantially less. These findings underscore the potential applicability of telemedicine approaches to eating disorder treatment and psychiatric treatment in general.
已经开发出了许多治疗神经性贪食症的有效方法,但由于传播方面的问题,这些方法的应用并不频繁。本研究的目的是评估通过远程医疗提供认知行为疗法治疗神经性贪食症的成本效益。
这是一项针对神经性贪食症的面对面治疗与远程医疗认知行为疗法的随机对照试验。128 名患有 DSM-IV 神经性贪食症或未特指的神经性贪食障碍亚综合征变体的女性被随机分配到 16 周内进行 20 次治疗。从社会角度进行了成本效益分析。
每个康复(戒断)患者的总成本分别为面对面 CBT 为 9324.68 美元,远程 CBT 为 7300.40 美元。成本差异主要归因于治疗师的差旅费用。对治疗次数成本、汽油成本和远程医疗连接成本进行的敏感性分析得出了基本相似的结果。
在这项研究中,面对面和远程医疗提供的 CBT 同样有效,而远程医疗的成本要低得多。这些发现强调了远程医疗方法在治疗饮食障碍和一般精神疾病方面的潜在适用性。