Schensul Stephen L, Saggurti Niranjan, Singh Rajendra, Verma Ravi K, Nastasi Bonnie K, Mazumder Papiya Guha
Department of Community Medicine & Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-6325, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Jun;43(3-4):277-91. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9241-0.
This paper explores the meaning and applicability of multilevel interventions and the role of ethnography in identifying intervention opportunities and accounting for research design limitations. It utilizes as a case example the data and experiences from a 6-year, NIMH-funded, intervention to prevent HIV/STI among married men in urban poor communities in Mumbai, India. The experiences generated by this project illustrate the need for multilevel interventions to include: (1) ethnographically driven formative research to delineate appropriate levels, stakeholders and collaborators; (2) identification of ways to link interventions to the local culture and community context; (3) the development of a model of intervention that is sufficiently flexible to be consistently applied to different intervention levels using comparable culturally congruent concepts and approaches; (4) mechanisms to involve community residents, community based organizations and community-based institutions; and (5) approaches to data collection that can evaluate the impact of the project on multiple intersecting levels.
本文探讨了多层次干预措施的意义与适用性,以及人种志在识别干预机会和考量研究设计局限性方面的作用。它以印度孟买城市贫困社区中一项由美国国立精神卫生研究所资助、为期6年的预防已婚男性感染艾滋病毒/性传播感染的干预措施所产生的数据和经验为例。该项目所产生的经验表明,多层次干预措施需要包括:(1)以人种志为导向的形成性研究,以界定适当的层面、利益相关者和合作伙伴;(2)确定将干预措施与当地文化和社区背景相联系的方法;(3)开发一种干预模式,该模式要足够灵活,能够使用具有文化一致性的可比概念和方法始终如一地应用于不同的干预层面;(4)让社区居民、社区组织和社区机构参与的机制;以及(5)能够评估项目在多个交叉层面上影响的数据收集方法。