Unsworth Nash
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):386-96. doi: 10.1080/09658210902802959.
Two experiments examined the notion that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) are partially due to differences in search set size in cued recall. High and low WMC individuals performed variants of a cued recall task with either unrelated cue words (Experiment 1) or specific cue phrases (Experiment 2). Across both experiments low WMC individuals recalled fewer items, made more errors, and had longer correct recall latencies than high WMC individuals. Cross-experimental analyses suggested that providing participants with more specific cues decreased the size of the search set, leading to better recall overall. However, these effects were equivalent for high and low WMC. It is argued that these results are consistent with a search model framework in which low WMC individuals search through a larger set of items than high WMC individuals.
两项实验检验了这样一种观点,即工作记忆容量(WMC)的个体差异部分归因于线索回忆中搜索集大小的差异。高WMC个体和低WMC个体执行了线索回忆任务的变体,实验1使用不相关的线索词,实验2使用特定的线索短语。在两个实验中,低WMC个体回忆的项目较少,错误较多,正确回忆潜伏期比高WMC个体更长。跨实验分析表明,为参与者提供更具体的线索会减小搜索集的大小,从而总体上带来更好的回忆。然而,这些效应在高WMC和低WMC个体中是相同的。有人认为,这些结果与一个搜索模型框架一致,在该框架中,低WMC个体比高WMC个体搜索的项目集更大。