Christopher Michael S, Charoensuk Sukjai, Gilbert Brennan D, Neary Timothy J, Pearce Kelly L
Pacific University, Portland, OR 97205, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;65(6):590-612. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20580.
The study and practice of mindfulness is rapidly expanding in Western psychology. Recently developed self-report measures of mindfulness were derived from Western operationalizations and cross-cultural validation of many of these measures is lacking, particularly in Buddhist cultures. Therefore, this study examined the measurement equivalence of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) and Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) among Thai (n=385) and American (n=365) college students. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis models fit to the data revealed that the KIMS lacked configural invariance across groups, which precluded subsequent invariance tests, and although the MAAS demonstrated configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance, there was no significant latent mean MAAS difference between Thais and Americans. These findings suggest that Eastern and Western conceptualizations of mindfulness may have important differences.
正念的研究与实践在西方心理学领域正迅速扩展。近期开发的正念自我报告测量方法源自西方的操作化定义,且许多此类测量方法缺乏跨文化验证,尤其是在佛教文化中。因此,本研究考察了泰国(n = 385)和美国(n = 365)大学生中《肯塔基正念技能量表》(KIMS)和《正念注意觉知量表》(MAAS)的测量等效性。拟合数据的多组验证性因素分析模型显示,KIMS在各群体间缺乏构型不变性,这使得后续的不变性检验无法进行,尽管MAAS表现出构型、度量和部分标量不变性,但泰国人和美国人之间的MAAS潜在均值并无显著差异。这些发现表明,东西方对正念的概念化可能存在重要差异。