Butler Lisa D, Koopman Cheryl, Azarow Jay, Blasey Christine M, Magdalene Juliette C, DiMiceli Sue, Seagraves David A, Hastings T Andrew, Chen Xin-Hua, Garlan Robert W, Kraemer Helena C, Spiegel David
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Apr;197(4):266-73. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31819d9334.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 inflicted distress beyond those directly exposed, thereby providing an opportunity to examine the contributions of a range of factors (cognitive, emotional, social support, coping) to psychological resilience for those indirectly exposed. In an Internet convenience sample of 1281, indices of resilience (higher well-being, lower distress) at baseline (2.5-12 weeks post-attack) were each associated with less emotional suppression, denial and self-blame, and fewer negative worldview changes. After controlling for initial outcomes, baseline negative worldview changes and aspects of social support and coping all remained significant predictors of 6-month outcomes, with worldview changes bearing the strongest relationship to each. These findings highlight the role of emotional, coping, social support, and particularly, cognitive variables in adjustment after terrorism.
2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击给受害者带来了巨大的痛苦,也为研究一系列因素(认知、情感、社会支持、应对方式)对间接受害者心理恢复力的影响提供了契机。在一个由1281人组成的网络便利样本中,基线时(袭击后2.5至12周)的恢复力指标(更高的幸福感、更低的痛苦程度)与较少的情绪压抑、否认和自责以及较少的负面世界观改变相关。在控制初始结果后,基线时的负面世界观改变以及社会支持和应对方式的各个方面仍然是6个月后结果的显著预测因素,其中世界观改变与结果的关系最为密切。这些发现凸显了情感、应对方式、社会支持,尤其是认知变量在恐怖袭击后心理调适过程中的作用。