• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了清洁发电,焚烧垃圾和填埋垃圾哪种方式更好?

Is it better to burn or bury waste for clean electricity generation?

作者信息

Kaplan P Ozge, Decarolis Joseph, Thorneloe Susan

机构信息

National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 15;43(6):1711-7. doi: 10.1021/es802395e.

DOI:10.1021/es802395e
PMID:19368161
Abstract

The use of municipal solid waste (MSW) to generate electricity through landfill-gas-to-energy (LFGTE) and waste-to-energy (WTE) projects represents roughly 14% of U.S. nonhydro renewable electricity generation. Although various aspects of LFGTE and WTE have been analyzed in the literature, this paper is the first to present a comprehensive set of life-cycle emission factors per unit of electricity generated for these energy recovery options. In addition, sensitivity analysis is conducted on key inputs (e.g., efficiency of the WTE plant landfill gas management schedules, oxidation rate, and waste composition) to quantify the variability in the resultant life-cycle emissions estimates. While methane from landfills results from the anaerobic breakdown of biogenic materials, the energy derived from WTE results from the combustion of both biogenic and fossil materials. The greenhouse gas emissions for WTE ranges from 0.4 to 1.5 MTCO2e/MWh, whereas the most agressive LFGTE scenerio results in 2.3 MTCO2e/MWh. WTE also produces lower NO(x) emissions than LFGTE, whereas SO(x) emissions depend on the specific configurations of WTE and LFGTE.

摘要

通过垃圾填埋气发电(LFGTE)和垃圾焚烧发电(WTE)项目利用城市固体废物(MSW)发电约占美国非水电可再生能源发电量的14%。尽管文献中已对LFGTE和WTE的各个方面进行了分析,但本文首次针对这些能源回收方案给出了每发一度电的一套全面的生命周期排放因子。此外,对关键输入参数(如WTE工厂的效率、垃圾填埋气管理计划、氧化率和废物成分)进行了敏感性分析,以量化所得生命周期排放估算值的变异性。虽然垃圾填埋场的甲烷来自生物材料的厌氧分解,但WTE产生的能源来自生物材料和化石材料的燃烧。WTE的温室气体排放量在0.4至1.5公吨二氧化碳当量/兆瓦时之间,而最激进的LFGTE情景下排放量为2.3公吨二氧化碳当量/兆瓦时。WTE产生的氮氧化物排放量也低于LFGTE,而硫氧化物排放量则取决于WTE和LFGTE的具体配置。

相似文献

1
Is it better to burn or bury waste for clean electricity generation?为了清洁发电,焚烧垃圾和填埋垃圾哪种方式更好?
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 15;43(6):1711-7. doi: 10.1021/es802395e.
2
Climate Change Impacts of Electricity Generated at a Waste-to-Energy Facility.垃圾焚烧发电的气候变化影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 2;55(3):1436-1445. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03477. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
CCA-treated wood disposed in landfills and life-cycle trade-offs with waste-to-energy and MSW landfill disposal.置于垃圾填埋场的经CCA处理的木材以及与垃圾转化能源和城市固体废弃物填埋处置相关的生命周期权衡。
Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):S21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
4
An integrated analytical framework for quantifying the LCOE of waste-to-energy facilities for a range of greenhouse gas emissions policy and technical factors.用于量化一系列温室气体排放政策和技术因素的垃圾焚烧能源设施的平准化度电成本的综合分析框架。
Waste Manag. 2012 Jul;32(7):1366-77. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
5
Bury or burn North America MSW? LCAs provide answers for climate impacts & carbon neutral power potential.埋葬还是焚烧北美 MSW?生命周期评估为气候影响和碳中性电力潜力提供答案。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Oct 15;44(20):7944-9. doi: 10.1021/es100529f.
6
A new method to determine the ratio of electricity production from fossil and biogenic sources in waste-to-Energy plants.一种确定垃圾焚烧发电厂中化石能源和生物能源发电比例的新方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2579-86. doi: 10.1021/es0617587.
7
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
8
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
9
Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and the feed-in tariff system of waste-to-energy facilities using a system dynamics model.采用系统动力学模型评估垃圾焚烧能源设施的温室气体排放和上网电价补贴系统。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 20;792:148445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148445. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
Harnessing landfill gas (LFG) for electricity: A strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Jakarta (Indonesia).利用垃圾填埋气(LFG)发电:缓解雅加达(印度尼西亚)温室气体(GHG)排放的策略。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113882. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113882. Epub 2021 Oct 9.