Carton Ann-Katherine, Acciavatti Raymond, Kuo Johnny, Maidment Andrew D A
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):920-8. doi: 10.1118/1.3077922.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of an antiscatter grid and its potential benefit on image quality for a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) detector geometry at energies typical for temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced (CE) breast imaging. The signal intensities from primary, scatter, and glare were quantified in images acquired with an a-Si/CsI(T1) FFDM detector using a Rh target and a 0.27 mm Cu filter at tube voltages ranging from 35 to 49 kV. Measurements were obtained at the center of the irradiation region of 20-80 mm thick breast-equivalent phantoms. The phantoms were imaged with and without an antiscatter grid. Based on these data, the performance of the antiscatter grid was determined by calculating the primary and scatter transmission factors (T(P) and T(S)) and Bucky factors (Bf). In addition, glare-to-primary ratios (GPRs) and scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs) were quantified. The effect of the antiscatter grid on the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) was also assessed. It was found that T(P) increases with kV but does not depend on the phantom thickness; T(P) values between 0.81 and 0.84 were measured. T(S) increases with kV and phantom thickness; T(S) values between 0.13 and 0.21 were measured. Bf decreases with kV and increases with phantom thickness; Bf ranges from 1.4 to 2.1. GPR is nearly constant, varying from 0.10 to 0.11. SPR without an antiscatter grid (SPR-) ranges from 0.35 to 1.34. SPR- decreases by approximately 9% from 35 to 49 kV for a given phantom thickness and is 3.5 times larger for an 80 mm thick breast-equivalent phantom than for a 20 mm thick breast-equivalent phantom. SPR with an antiscatter grid (SPR+) ranges from 0.06 to 0.31. SPR+ increases by approximately 23% from 35 to 49 kV for a given phantom thickness; SPR+ is four times larger for an 80 mm breast-equivalent phantom than for a 20 mm breast-equivalent phantom. When imaging a 25 mm PMMA plate at the same mean glandular dose with and without an antiscatter grid, the SDNR is 4% greater with a grid than without. For an 75 mm PMMA plate, the SDNR is 20% greater with a grid. In conclusion, at the higher x-ray energy range used for CE-DM and CE-DBT, an antiscatter grid significantly reduces SPR and improves SDNR. These effects are most pronounced for thick breasts.
本研究的目的是评估在时间减影对比增强(CE)乳腺成像的典型能量下,针对全场数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)探测器几何结构的防散射格栅的性能及其对图像质量的潜在益处。使用Rh靶和0.27 mm铜滤过器,在管电压范围为35至49 kV时,用非晶硅/碘化铯(a-Si/CsI(T1))FFDM探测器采集的图像中,对原发射线、散射射线和眩光的信号强度进行了量化。在20至80 mm厚的乳腺等效体模的照射区域中心进行了测量。在有和没有防散射格栅的情况下对体模进行成像。基于这些数据,通过计算原发射线和散射射线透过因子(T(P)和T(S))以及滤线栅因子(Bf)来确定防散射格栅的性能。此外,还对眩光与原发射线的比值(GPR)和散射与原发射线的比值(SPR)进行了量化。还评估了防散射格栅对信号差噪比(SDNR)的影响。结果发现,T(P)随管电压升高而增加,但不依赖于体模厚度;测量得到的T(P)值在0.81至0.84之间。T(S)随管电压和体模厚度增加;测量得到的T(S)值在0.13至0.21之间。Bf随管电压降低而增加,随体模厚度增加;Bf范围为1.4至2.1。GPR几乎恒定,在0.10至0.11之间变化。没有防散射格栅时的SPR(SPR-)范围为0.35至1.34。对于给定的体模厚度,SPR-在35至49 kV之间降低约9%,对于80 mm厚的乳腺等效体模,其值是20 mm厚乳腺等效体模的3.5倍。有防散射格栅时的SPR(SPR+)范围为0.06至0.31。对于给定的体模厚度,SPR+在35至49 kV之间增加约23%;对于80 mm乳腺等效体模,SPR+是20 mm乳腺等效体模的四倍。在相同平均腺体剂量下,对25 mm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)板进行成像时,有防散射格栅时的SDNR比没有时高4%。对于75 mm的PMMA板,有防散射格栅时的SDNR高20%。总之,在用于CE-DM和CE-DBT的较高X射线能量范围内,防散射格栅显著降低SPR并提高SDNR。这些效果在厚乳腺中最为明显。