Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后不久自感用力度评分的可重复性:在压力测试诊所和康复健身房的反应

Reproducibility of ratings of perceived exertion soon after myocardial infarction: responses in the stress-testing clinic and the rehabilitation gymnasium.

作者信息

Buckley John P, Sim Julius, Eston Roger G

机构信息

Centre for Exercise and Nutrition Science, University of Chester, Chester, Cheshire, UK.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2009 Apr;52(4):421-7. doi: 10.1080/00140130802707691.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare ratings of perceived exertion (RPE; Borg's 6-20 scale) at the same exercise intensity, between a standard exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) treadmill stress test (exECG) and two subsequent bouts of treadmill exercise in a cardiac rehabilitation gymnasium. Eleven patients (mean +/- s) 60.8 +/- 6.1 years performed an exECG within 12.1 +/- 7.5 d after myocardial infarction (MI) and commenced their first exercise-based rehabilitation session (gym-1), which included the use of a motorised treadmill, within 5.0 +/- 1.3 d after the exECG. A second gym session (gym-2) was performed within 4.2 +/- 1.3 d of gym-1. Gym-1 and gym-2 treadmill exercise was performed at an intensity that equated to the penultimate testing stage of exECG, and RPE and heart rate were compared at this level between the three sessions of testing. The mean work rate at the penultimate testing stage of the exECG was 6.0 +/- 1.0 metabolic equivalents; approximately 67% of peak work rate. The RPE at this work rate during exECG, gym-1 and gym-2 were 15.8 +/- 2.7, 13.3 +/- 3.4 and 13.0 +/- 3.6, respectively. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed these RPE responses to be significantly different (F (2, 20) = 9.8; p = 0.001). Post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected pairwise t-tests showed significant differences (p < or = 0.008) between exECG and gym-1 and exECG and gym-2 but not between gym-1 and gym-2. There was no significant difference in heart rate between the three testing sessions (p = 0.076) but it showed signs of a similar trend to RPE. The intra-participant agreement in RPE between gym-1 and gym-2 was substantial; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)) = 0.85 (p < 0.001) and in all but one participant, RPE differed by < or =2 scale points. The RPE responses during standardised exECG treadmill testing, in patients soon after MI, are inflated compared to responses at the same treadmill work rate during subsequent cardiac rehabilitation exercise sessions. Caution is advised in using RPE taken from an initial exECG to guide physical activity in MI patients, but introducing RPE at this point contributes to its subsequent reliable use.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在相同运动强度下,标准运动心电图(ECG)跑步机压力测试(exECG)与在心脏康复健身房进行的两轮后续跑步机运动之间的主观用力程度评级(RPE;Borg的6-20级量表)。11名患者(平均±标准差),年龄60.8±6.1岁,在心肌梗死(MI)后12.1±7.5天内进行了exECG,并在exECG后5.0±1.3天内开始了他们的第一次基于运动的康复训练课程(健身房-1),其中包括使用电动跑步机。在健身房-1后的4.2±1.3天内进行了第二次健身房训练课程(健身房-2)。健身房-1和健身房-2的跑步机运动强度与exECG的倒数第二个测试阶段相当,并在这三个测试阶段比较了该强度下的RPE和心率。exECG倒数第二个测试阶段的平均工作率为6.0±1.0代谢当量;约为峰值工作率的67%。在exECG、健身房-1和健身房-2期间,该工作率下的RPE分别为15.8±2.7、13.3±3.4和13.0±3.6。重复测量方差分析显示这些RPE反应有显著差异(F(2, 20)=9.8;p = 0.001)。事后Bonferroni校正的成对t检验显示exECG与健身房-1以及exECG与健身房-2之间有显著差异(p≤0.008),但健身房-1和健身房-2之间没有显著差异。三个测试阶段之间的心率没有显著差异(p = 0.076),但显示出与RPE相似的趋势迹象。健身房-1和健身房-2之间RPE的受试者内一致性很高;组内相关系数(ICC(2,1))=0.85(p<0.001),除一名参与者外,所有参与者的RPE差异≤2个量表点。与心肌梗死后不久的患者在后续心脏康复运动课程中相同跑步机工作率下的反应相比,标准化exECG跑步机测试期间的RPE反应被夸大。建议谨慎使用从初始exECG获得的RPE来指导心肌梗死患者的身体活动,但此时引入RPE有助于其后续的可靠使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验