• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年和青年约会关系中性侵犯的患病率及预测因素。

Prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults.

作者信息

Muñoz-Rivas Marina J, Graña José Luis, O'Leary K Daniel, González M Pilar

机构信息

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Psicología, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2009 May;21(2):234-40.

PMID:19403076
Abstract

Dyadic influences among the diverse forms of aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults have been reported in various studies. The goal of this research was to extend a dyadic model of physical aggression against partners to sexual aggression against partners. An urban sample of 4,052 adolescents and young adults of both genders, between 16 and 26 years old, was used. The percentage of male aggressors was significantly higher than that of the females (35.7% vs. 14.9%) and the percentage of victimization was higher for the women (25.1% vs.21.7%). Sexual aggression and sexual victimization was almost solely psychological in nature, that is, verbal coercion. As predicted by the dyadic model of physical aggression in dating relationships, sexual victimization was best predicted by sexual aggression of the individuals in this study both for males and females.

摘要

多项研究报告了青少年和年轻成年人恋爱关系中不同形式攻击行为的二元影响。本研究的目的是将针对伴侣的身体攻击二元模型扩展到针对伴侣的性攻击。研究采用了一个城市样本,包括4052名年龄在16至26岁之间的男女青少年和年轻成年人。男性攻击者的比例显著高于女性(35.7%对14.9%),而女性的受害比例更高(25.1%对21.7%)。性攻击和性受害几乎完全是心理层面的,即言语胁迫。正如恋爱关系中身体攻击二元模型所预测的那样,在本研究中,无论是男性还是女性,性受害最好由个体的性攻击来预测。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression in dating relationships of adolescents and young adults.青少年和青年约会关系中性侵犯的患病率及预测因素。
Psicothema. 2009 May;21(2):234-40.
2
Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification, and health consequences.青少年恋爱关系中的攻击行为:发生率、合理性及健康后果。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Apr;40(4):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.137. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
3
Rates and risk factors for sexual violence among an ethnically diverse sample of adolescents.不同种族青少年样本中性暴力的发生率及风险因素。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Dec;158(12):1132-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.12.1132.
4
A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression.青少年约会暴力的二元纵向模型。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(3):314-27. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_01.
5
Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.所有犯罪者都一样吗?比较性胁迫和侵犯的风险因素。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):402-26. doi: 10.1177/1079063210372140. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
6
Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students.针对女性和男性的性胁迫预测因素:一项针对大学生的多层次、跨国研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Jun;36(3):403-22. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9141-4.
7
Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students.多民族高中生约会攻击行为中的性别差异。
J Adolesc Health. 2008 May;42(5):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.012. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
Sexual coercion among adolescents in northern Thailand: prevalence and associated factors.泰国北部青少年中的性胁迫行为:患病率及相关因素。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003 Jun;34(2):447-57.
9
Risk models of dating aggression across different adolescent relationships: a developmental psychopathology approach.不同青少年恋爱关系中的约会攻击风险模型:一种发展心理病理学方法
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):622-32. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.622.
10
Perceived conflict patterns and relationship quality associated with verbal sexual coercion by male dating partners.与男性约会伴侣的言语性胁迫相关的感知冲突模式和关系质量。
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Jun;23(6):798-814. doi: 10.1177/0886260507313949. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on the types of abuse in young couples as a function of sex.关于年轻情侣间虐待类型与性别的关系研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 21;14:1166834. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166834. eCollection 2023.
2
Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Violence Exerted, Received, and Perceived in Teen Dating Relationships.青少年恋爱关系中情绪智力与施、受、感知暴力的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052284.
3
Perception of Dating Violence in Teenage Couples: A Cross Validation Study in Spain and Colombia.
青少年情侣对约会暴力的感知:在西班牙和哥伦比亚的交叉验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;17(18):6769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186769.
4
Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis.青少年恋爱暴力、性别歧视与适应力:多变量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082652.
5
Personality characteristics of a sample of violent adolescents against their partners.暴力青少年样本针对其伴侣的人格特征。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2019 Apr 15;32(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41155-019-0122-7.
6
Cultural Adaptation of the Modified Version of the Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) in Mexican Adolescents.针对墨西哥青少年的冲突策略量表修订版(M-CTS)的文化适应性研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 21;10:619. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00619. eCollection 2019.
7
Big Boys Don't Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization.《大男孩不哭:对男性性侵害的批判性解释性综述》
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Dec;21(5):991-1010. doi: 10.1177/1524838018816979. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
8
Does Gottman's Marital Communication Conceptualization Inform Teen Dating Violence? Communication Skill Deficits Analyzed Across Three Samples of Diverse Adolescents.戈特曼婚姻沟通概念是否影响青少年恋爱暴力?对三个不同青少年群体样本的沟通技巧缺陷进行分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):NP6411-NP6440. doi: 10.1177/0886260518814267. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
9
The role of self-objectification and women's blame, sympathy, and support for a rape victim.自我客体化与女性对强奸受害者的指责、同情和支持的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199808. eCollection 2018.
10
Designing an Internet Intervention for Emerging Adults Who Experience Troubled Relationships.为经历关系困扰的新兴成年人设计网络干预措施。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Jun;31(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 7.