Kapur Gaurav, Valentini Rudolph P, Imam Abubakr A, Mattoo Tej K
Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;4(5):907-13. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04390808. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
Severe edema in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) may be associated with volume contraction (VC) or volume expansion (VE). Usually, severe edema in children is treated with intravenous (IV) albumin and diuretics, which is appropriate for VC patients. However, in VE patients, this can precipitate fluid overload. The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment of severe edema in NS with diuretics alone.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Thirty NS patients with severe edema were enrolled in this prospective study in two phases. VC was diagnosed based on fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) <1%. VC patients received IV albumin and furosemide. VE patients received IV furosemide and oral spironolactone. On the basis of phase 1 observations, FeNa <0.2% identified VC in 20 phase 2 patients.
All phase 1 patients had FeNa <1%. Phase 1 patients when reanalyzed based on a FeNa cutoff of 0.2%; it was noted that VC patients had higher BUN, BUN/creatinine ratio, urine osmolality, and lower FeNa and urine sodium compared with VE patients. Similar results were observed in phase 2. VC patients had significantly higher renin, aldosterone, and antidiuretic hormone levels. In phase 2, 11 VE patients received diuretics alone and 9 VC patients received albumin and furosemide. There was no difference in hospital stay and weight loss in VC and VE groups after treatment.
FeNa is useful in distinguishing VC versus VE in NS children with severe edema. The use of diuretics alone in VE patients is safe and effective.
肾病综合征(NS)患儿的严重水肿可能与容量收缩(VC)或容量扩张(VE)有关。通常,儿童严重水肿采用静脉注射(IV)白蛋白和利尿剂治疗,这适用于VC患者。然而,对于VE患者,这可能会导致液体超负荷。本研究的目的是评估单用利尿剂治疗NS严重水肿的效果。
设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:30例严重水肿的NS患者分两个阶段纳入本前瞻性研究。根据尿钠排泄分数(FeNa)<1%诊断为VC。VC患者接受静脉注射白蛋白和呋塞米。VE患者接受静脉注射呋塞米和口服螺内酯。根据第1阶段的观察结果,FeNa<0.2%可识别出20例第2阶段患者中的VC。
所有第1阶段患者的FeNa<1%。根据FeNa临界值0.2%对第1阶段患者重新分析时发现,与VE患者相比,VC患者的血尿素氮(BUN)、BUN/肌酐比值、尿渗透压更高,而FeNa和尿钠更低。在第2阶段观察到类似结果。VC患者的肾素、醛固酮和抗利尿激素水平显著更高。在第2阶段,11例VE患者单用利尿剂,9例VC患者接受白蛋白和呋塞米治疗。治疗后,VC组和VE组的住院时间和体重减轻无差异。
FeNa有助于区分NS严重水肿患儿的VC和VE。VE患者单用利尿剂安全有效。