• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ju Woong, Myung Seung-Kwon, Kim Yeol, Choi Hyuck Jae, Kim Seung Cheol

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):400-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1caf8.

DOI:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1caf8
PMID:19407567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma compared with laparotomy.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Review databases in September 2007. Three independent evaluators selected the articles according to predetermined selection criteria.

RESULTS

Thirteen comparative studies (5 prospective and 8 retrospective) that met the selection criteria were included. In a fixed-effects meta-analysis, the overall survival and therecurrence rate showed no significant differences between the laparoscopy and the laparotomy groups, with odds ratios of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.62) and 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.16), respectively. However, the complication rate was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group with an odds ratio of 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival outcome and recurrence rate after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma were similar to those in the laparotomy procedures. However, the complication rate was lower after laparoscopy compared with laparotomy.

摘要

背景

本荟萃分析旨在研究子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术与开腹手术相比的结果。

方法

我们于2007年9月检索了MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库。三位独立评估者根据预先确定的选择标准筛选文章。

结果

纳入了13项符合选择标准的比较研究(5项前瞻性研究和8项回顾性研究)。在固定效应荟萃分析中,腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组的总生存率和复发率无显著差异,优势比分别为0.84(95%置信区间,0.64 - 1.62)和0.90(95%置信区间,0.49 - 1.16)。然而,腹腔镜手术组的并发症发生率低于开腹手术组,优势比为0.43(95%置信区间,0.32 - 0.58)。

结论

子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术后的生存结果和复发率与开腹手术相似。然而,与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术后的并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项荟萃分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Apr;19(3):400-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1caf8.
2
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
3
Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD007585. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4.
4
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer.I期子宫内膜癌的辅助放疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003916.pub4.
5
A Comparison of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Open Hysterectomy With or Without Lymphadenectomy for Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Medical Research Council ASTEC Trial.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术加或不加淋巴结清扫术治疗疑似早期子宫内膜癌的疗效比较:医学研究委员会ASTEC试验结果
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1424-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000521.
6
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer.I期子宫内膜癌的辅助放疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14(3):CD003916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003916.pub3.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.计算机断层扫描(CT)后腹腔镜检查对评估胰腺癌和壶腹周围癌根治性切除可能性的诊断准确性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 6;7(7):CD009323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009323.pub3.
8
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜手术及剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
10
Axillary treatment for operable primary breast cancer.可手术原发性乳腺癌的腋窝治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD004561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004561.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
An institutional study: Does Body Mass Index influence surgical approach, surgical morbidities, and outcomes in endometrial cancer patients?一项机构研究:体重指数是否会影响子宫内膜癌患者的手术方式、手术并发症及预后?
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Sep;15(3):259-268. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.3.081.
2
Omentectomy for oncological surgical staging by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES): a preliminary study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)行网膜切除术用于肿瘤外科分期的初步研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jul 27;10:1224770. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1224770. eCollection 2023.
3
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 31;10(10):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
4
Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in the Treatment of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗高危子宫内膜癌的倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1245. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001245.
5
Surgical management of early endometrial cancer: an update and proposal of a therapeutic algorithm.早期子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:治疗算法的更新与建议
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 26;20:1298-313. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890478.
6
Use of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer - Results of a 2012 Germany-wide Survey.腹腔镜检查在子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌治疗中的应用——2012年全德范围内的调查结果
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Sep;73(9):911-917. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350877.
7
Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.亚洲妇科肿瘤学会 2010 年研讨会。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(3):137-50. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.3.137. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer.腹腔镜与传统开腹手术分期治疗子宫内膜癌的比较。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jun;21(2):106-11. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.2.106. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
Laparoscopic surgery is a current tide of widely accepted standard procedure for endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术是目前广泛接受的子宫内膜癌标准手术方式。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jun;21(2):67-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.2.67. Epub 2010 Jun 30.